[PATCH v4] net/ice: improve performance of RX timestamp offload
Kevin Traynor
ktraynor at redhat.com
Thu Mar 24 12:16:57 CET 2022
On 24/03/2022 09:09, Zhang, Qi Z wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Wu, Wenjun1 <wenjun1.wu at intel.com>
>> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 3:36 PM
>> To: dev at dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>; Yang, Qiming
>> <qiming.yang at intel.com>
>> Cc: Van Haaren, Harry <harry.van.haaren at intel.com>; Su, Simei
>> <simei.su at intel.com>; Wu, Wenjun1 <wenjun1.wu at intel.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH v4] net/ice: improve performance of RX timestamp offload
>>
>> Previously, each time a burst of packets is received, SW reads HW register
>> and assembles it and the timestamp from descriptor together to get the
>> complete 64 bits timestamp.
>>
>> This patch optimizes the algorithm. The SW only needs to check the
>> monotonicity of the low 32bits timestamp to avoid crossing borders.
>> Each time before SW receives a burst of packets, it should check the time
>> difference between current time and last update time to avoid the low 32
>> bits timestamp cycling twice.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wenjun Wu <wenjun1.wu at intel.com>
>
> Added cc stable
>
Hi Qi. The DPDK documentation has guidance about what should be
backported to LTS [0] and distinguishes between fixes and performance
improvements. Please try and stick with this when applying patches or
let LTS maintainers know if there is a debatable case.
thanks,
Kevin.
[0]
http://doc.dpdk.org/guides-21.11/contributing/stable.html#what-changes-should-be-backported
> Acked-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>
>
> Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel.
>
> Thanks
> Qi
>
More information about the dev
mailing list