[PATCH v3 3/5] app/testpmd: fix port status of slave device
Konstantin Ananyev
konstantin.v.ananyev at yandex.ru
Tue May 10 23:48:42 CEST 2022
Hi Ferruh,
> On 5/6/2022 9:16 AM, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
>> Hi, Konstantin,
>>
>> 在 2022/5/4 7:39, Konstantin Ananyev 写道:
>>> 03/05/2022 11:02, Min Hu (Connor) пишет:
>>>> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong at huawei.com>
>>>>
>>>> Starting or stopping a bonded port also starts or stops all active
>>>> slaves
>>>> under the bonded port. If this port is a bonded device, we need to
>>>> modify
>>>> the port status of all slaves.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 0e545d3047fe ("app/testpmd: check stopping port is not in
>>>> bonding")
>>>> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong at huawei.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29 at huawei.com>
>>>> Acked-by: Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh at intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 1 +
>>>> app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 74
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>> app/test-pmd/testpmd.h | 3 +-
>>>> 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>>> index 6ffea8e21a..d9fc7a88bd 100644
>>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>>>> @@ -6671,6 +6671,7 @@ static void
>>>> cmd_create_bonded_device_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>>>> "Failed to enable promiscuous mode for port %u: %s
>>>> - ignore\n",
>>>> port_id, rte_strerror(-ret));
>>>> + ports[port_id].bond_flag = 1;
>>>> ports[port_id].need_setup = 0;
>>>> ports[port_id].port_status = RTE_PORT_STOPPED;
>>>> }
>>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
>>>> index fe2ce19f99..dc90600787 100644
>>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
>>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
>>>> @@ -66,6 +66,9 @@
>>>> #ifdef RTE_EXEC_ENV_WINDOWS
>>>> #include <process.h>
>>>> #endif
>>>> +#ifdef RTE_NET_BOND
>>>> +#include <rte_eth_bond.h>
>>>> +#endif
>>>> #include "testpmd.h"
>>>> @@ -597,11 +600,57 @@ eth_dev_configure_mp(uint16_t port_id,
>>>> uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q,
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>> +#ifdef RTE_NET_BOND
>>>> +static int
>>>> +change_bonding_slave_port_status(portid_t bond_pid, bool is_stop)
>>>> +{
>>>> + portid_t slave_pids[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS];
>>>> + struct rte_port *port;
>>>> + int num_slaves;
>>>> + portid_t slave_pid;
>>>> + int i;
>>>> +
>>>> + num_slaves = rte_eth_bond_slaves_get(bond_pid, slave_pids,
>>>> + RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS);
>>>> + if (num_slaves < 0) {
>>>> + fprintf(stderr, "Failed to get slave list for port = %u\n",
>>>> + bond_pid);
>>>> + return num_slaves;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < num_slaves; i++) {
>>>> + slave_pid = slave_pids[i];
>>>> + port = &ports[slave_pid];
>>>> + port->port_status =
>>>> + is_stop ? RTE_PORT_STOPPED : RTE_PORT_STARTED;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +#endif
>>>> +
>>>> static int
>>>> eth_dev_start_mp(uint16_t port_id)
>>>> {
>>>> - if (is_proc_primary())
>>>> - return rte_eth_dev_start(port_id);
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (is_proc_primary()) {
>>>> + ret = rte_eth_dev_start(port_id);
>>>> + if (ret != 0)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +#ifdef RTE_NET_BOND
>>>> + struct rte_port *port = &ports[port_id];
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Starting a bonded port also starts all slaves under the
>>>> bonded
>>>> + * device. So if this port is bond device, we need to
>>>> modify the
>>>> + * port status of these slaves.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (port->bond_flag == 1)
>>>> + return change_bonding_slave_port_status(port_id, false);
>>>> +#endif
>>>> + }
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -609,8 +658,25 @@ eth_dev_start_mp(uint16_t port_id)
>>>> static int
>>>> eth_dev_stop_mp(uint16_t port_id)
>>>> {
>>>> - if (is_proc_primary())
>>>> - return rte_eth_dev_stop(port_id);
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (is_proc_primary()) {
>>>> + ret = rte_eth_dev_stop(port_id);
>>>> + if (ret != 0)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +#ifdef RTE_NET_BOND
>>>
>>> Here and in other places - probably no need to pollute the code
>>> with all these 'ifdef RTE_NET_BOND'.
>>> I suppose this logic (for checking is bonding API present or not)
>>> can be hidden inside change_bonding_slave_port_status() itself.
>>>
>> I think it does not pollute the code. anyone can tell according to
>> the flag 'ifdef RTE_NET_BOND'.
>> if hiddle inside 'change_bonding_slave_port_status', it will be weird.
>> For example, if the port is not bonding port, It will also invoke
>> 'change_bonding_slave_port_status'. That is unreasonable.
>>
>
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> I also was not happy to have bonding (or any PMD) ifdef in the generic
> (start()/stop()) functions, but the ifdef blocks updates testpmd
> (application) level status. So that can't be handled in the PMD and need
> to be in the application level.
> Which is enforcing to have same PMD specific code in the testpmd level,
> if you have any suggestion to prevent this, I am for it.
I am not aking to move it to PMD.
What I am saying that this ifdef logic could be grouped in one place
(inside change_bonding_slave_port_status()) instead of spreading it
around multiple places.
>
> I will proceed with first two patch of this set, which fixes bonding PMD
> issues, I will hold the testpmd ones for more comments.
>
> Thanks,
> ferruh
>
>>
>>>
>>>> + struct rte_port *port = &ports[port_id];
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Stopping a bonded port also stops all slaves under the
>>>> bonded
>>>> + * device. So if this port is bond device, we need to
>>>> modify the
>>>> + * port status of these slaves.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (port->bond_flag == 1)
>>>> + return change_bonding_slave_port_status(port_id, true);
>>>> +#endif
>>>> + }
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
>>>> index 31f766c965..67f253b30e 100644
>>>> --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
>>>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
>>>> @@ -266,7 +266,8 @@ struct rte_port {
>>>> uint32_t mc_addr_nb; /**< nb. of addr. in
>>>> mc_addr_pool */
>>>> queueid_t queue_nb; /**< nb. of queues for flow
>>>> rules */
>>>> uint32_t queue_sz; /**< size of a queue for
>>>> flow rules */
>>>> - uint8_t slave_flag; /**< bonding slave port */
>>>> + uint8_t slave_flag : 1, /**< bonding slave port */
>>>> + bond_flag : 1; /**< port is bond device */
>>>> struct port_template *pattern_templ_list; /**< Pattern
>>>> templates. */
>>>> struct port_template *actions_templ_list; /**< Actions
>>>> templates. */
>>>> struct port_table *table_list; /**< Flow tables. */
>>>
>>> .
>
More information about the dev
mailing list