[PATCH 05/12] net/hns3: fix an unreasonable memset

Andrew Rybchenko andrew.rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru
Fri May 20 09:58:45 CEST 2022


On 5/19/22 15:29, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong at huawei.com>
> 
> This patch fixes an unreasonable memset.
> 
> Fixes: bba636698316 ("net/hns3: support Rx/Tx and related operations")
> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong at huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29 at huawei.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/hns3/hns3_rxtx.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_rxtx.c
> index 510802be05..5a2cfe5a54 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_rxtx.c
> @@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ hns3vf_reset_all_tqps(struct hns3_hw *hw)
>   	int ret;
>   	uint16_t i;
>   
> -	memset(msg_data, 0, sizeof(uint16_t));
> +	memset(msg_data, 0, sizeof(msg_data));

It looks a bit suspicious. May be it is better to do:
     memset(&msg_data, 0, sizeof(msg_data));
It is pretty common mistake to do:
     memset(p, 0, sizeof(p));
instead of
     memset(p, 0, sizeof(*p));
when p is a pointer.
I realize that msg_data is an array in this case, but
I think it is better to avoid bad pattern in the code.

>   	ret = hns3_send_mbx_msg(hw, HNS3_MBX_QUEUE_RESET, 0, msg_data,
>   				sizeof(msg_data), true, &reset_status,
>   				sizeof(reset_status));



More information about the dev mailing list