[PATCH 05/12] net/hns3: fix an unreasonable memset
Andrew Rybchenko
andrew.rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru
Fri May 20 09:58:45 CEST 2022
On 5/19/22 15:29, Min Hu (Connor) wrote:
> From: Huisong Li <lihuisong at huawei.com>
>
> This patch fixes an unreasonable memset.
>
> Fixes: bba636698316 ("net/hns3: support Rx/Tx and related operations")
> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong at huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29 at huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/hns3/hns3_rxtx.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_rxtx.c
> index 510802be05..5a2cfe5a54 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_rxtx.c
> @@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ hns3vf_reset_all_tqps(struct hns3_hw *hw)
> int ret;
> uint16_t i;
>
> - memset(msg_data, 0, sizeof(uint16_t));
> + memset(msg_data, 0, sizeof(msg_data));
It looks a bit suspicious. May be it is better to do:
memset(&msg_data, 0, sizeof(msg_data));
It is pretty common mistake to do:
memset(p, 0, sizeof(p));
instead of
memset(p, 0, sizeof(*p));
when p is a pointer.
I realize that msg_data is an array in this case, but
I think it is better to avoid bad pattern in the code.
> ret = hns3_send_mbx_msg(hw, HNS3_MBX_QUEUE_RESET, 0, msg_data,
> sizeof(msg_data), true, &reset_status,
> sizeof(reset_status));
More information about the dev
mailing list