[PATCH] vhost: support sync copy when data buffer is small
Maxime Coquelin
maxime.coquelin at redhat.com
Mon May 23 10:49:54 CEST 2022
Hi Jiayu,
On 5/23/22 02:38, Hu, Jiayu wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2022 5:10 PM
>> To: Ma, WenwuX <wenwux.ma at intel.com>; Xia, Chenbo
>> <chenbo.xia at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
>> Cc: Hu, Jiayu <jiayu.hu at intel.com>; Wang, Yinan <yinan.wang at intel.com>;
>> He, Xingguang <xingguang.he at intel.com>; Ling, WeiX <weix.ling at intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost: support sync copy when data buffer is small
>>
>> Hi Wenwu,
>>
>> On 4/11/22 15:38, Wenwu Ma wrote:
>>> In async datapath, if the length of data buffer is less than 256, the
>>> data will be copied by CPU instead of DMA.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wenwu Ma <wenwux.ma at intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> lib/vhost/vhost.h | 6 ++-
>>> lib/vhost/virtio_net.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>> 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> As I mentioned in the past, let's have a DMA-only solution working before
>> trying to support CPU copy for small packets.
>
> Thanks for your suggestion.
>
> For "DMA-only solution working", do you mean community reaches an
> agreement on OVS DSA design? The reason of asking this question is
> that we will have some following patches around async vhost in 22.11,
> like vhostpmd supporting async vhost data-path. Regarding your suggestion,
> do you think they also need to be deferred until "DMA-only solution working"?
No, I was just referring to CPU copy for small buffers features.
Thanks,
Maxime
> Thanks,
> Jiayu
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Maxime
>
More information about the dev
mailing list