回复: [PATCH v1 3/3] examples/l3fwd-power: enable PMD power mgmt on Arm

[Feifei Wang]

> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>
> 发送时间: Monday, October 3, 2022 3:12 PM
> 收件人: Hunt, David <david.hunt at intel.com>; Feifei Wang
> <Feifei.Wang2 at arm.com>; Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang at arm.com>
> 抄送: dev at dpdk.org; nd <nd at arm.com>; thomas at monjalon.net
> 主题: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] examples/l3fwd-power: enable PMD power mgmt
> on Arm
> 
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 2:48 PM Hunt, David <david.hunt at intel.com> wrote:
> > On 25/08/2022 07:42, Feifei Wang wrote:
> > > For Arm aarch, power monitor uses WFE instruction to enable, which
> > > can not exit automatically within the time limit. This means
> > > 'rte_power_monitor_wakeup' API needs to be called to wake up sleep
> > > cores if there is no store operation to monitored address.
> > >
> > > Furthermore, we disable power monitor feature on the main core so
> > > that it can be used to wake up other sleeping cores when it receives
> > > SIGINT siginal.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2 at arm.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang at arm.com>
> > > ---
> > >   examples/l3fwd-power/main.c | 30
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > >   1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/examples/l3fwd-power/main.c
> > > b/examples/l3fwd-power/main.c index 887c6eae3f..2bd0d700f0 100644
> > > --- a/examples/l3fwd-power/main.c
> > > +++ b/examples/l3fwd-power/main.c
> > > @@ -432,8 +432,16 @@ static void
> > >   signal_exit_now(int sigtype)
> > >   {
> > >
> > > -     if (sigtype == SIGINT)
> > > +     if (sigtype == SIGINT) {
> > > +#if defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64)
> 
> Having a arch specific behavior in the application shows that there is
> something wrong either in the API, or in the Arm implementation of the API.
> I don't think this is a good solution.
> 
> Can't we find a better alternative? By changing the API probably?
Sorry I do not understand ' shows that there is something wrong either in the API'

Here we call ' rte_power_monitor_wakeup' API is due to that we need to wake
up all cores from WFE instructions in arm, and then l3fwd can exit correctly.

This is due to that arm arch is different from x86, if there is no packets received, x86's
'UMONITOR' can automatically exit from energy-saving state after waiting for a period of time.
But arm's 'WFE' can not exit automatically. It will wait 'SEV' instructions in wake_up API to wake
up it.

Finally, if user want to exit l3fwd by  'SIGINT' in arm, main core should firstly call 'wake_up' API
to force worker cores to exit from energy-saving state. 
Otherwise, the worker will stay in the energy-saving state forever if no packet is received.
> 
> 
> > > +     /**
> > > +      * wake_up api does not need input parameter on Arm,
> > > +      * so 0 is meaningless here.
> > > +      */
> > > +             rte_power_monitor_wakeup(0); #endif
> > >               quit_signal = true;
> > > +     }
> > >
> > >   }
> > >
> > > @@ -2885,6 +2893,25 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
> > >                                               "Error setting scaling freq max: err=%d,
> lcore %d\n",
> > >                                                       ret,
> > > lcore_id);
> > >
> > > +#if defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64)
> > > +                             /* Ensure the main lcore does not enter the power-
> monitor state,
> > > +                              * so that it can be used to wake up other lcores on ARM.
> > > +                              * This is due to WFE instruction has no timeout wake-up
> mechanism,
> > > +                              * and if users want to exit actively, the main lcore is
> needed
> > > +                              * to send SEV instruction to wake up other lcores.
> > > +                              */
> > > +                             unsigned int main_lcore = rte_get_main_lcore();
> > > +                             if (lcore_id != main_lcore ||
> > > +                                             pmgmt_type !=
> RTE_POWER_MGMT_TYPE_MONITOR) {
> > > +                                     ret = rte_power_ethdev_pmgmt_queue_enable(
> > > +                                                     lcore_id, portid, queueid,
> > > +                                                     pmgmt_type);
> > > +                                     if (ret < 0)
> > > +                                             rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE,
> > > +                                                     "rte_power_ethdev_pmgmt_queue_enable:
> err=%d, port=%d\n",
> > > +                                                     ret, portid);
> > > +                             }
> > > +#else
> > >                               ret = rte_power_ethdev_pmgmt_queue_enable(
> > >                                               lcore_id, portid, queueid,
> > >                                               pmgmt_type); @@
> > > -2892,6 +2919,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
> > >                                       rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE,
> > >                                               "rte_power_ethdev_pmgmt_queue_enable:
> err=%d, port=%d\n",
> > >                                                       ret, portid);
> > > +#endif
> > >                       }
> > >               }
> > >       }
> >
> >
> > Hi Feifei,
> >
> > Acked-by: David Hunt <david.hunt at intel.com>
> 
> 
> --
> David Marchand