[PATCH] net/nfp: add the feature of RSS based on VXLAN inner layer

[Chaoyong He]

> On 10/10/2022 7:28 AM, Chaoyong He wrote:
> > Add the logics to support the feature of RSS packets based on the
> > inner layer of VXLAN tunnel.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chaoyong He <chaoyong.he at corigine.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund at corigine.com>
> >
> > Depends-on: series-24819 ("preparation for the rte_flow offload of nfp
> > PMD")
> >
> > ---
> >   drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower.c             |   2 +-
> >   drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_cmsg.c        |   1 +
> >   drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_ctrl.c        |   2 +-
> >   drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_representor.c |   2 +-
> >   drivers/net/nfp/nfp_common.c                    |  33 +++++++
> >   drivers/net/nfp/nfp_common.h                    |   4 +
> >   drivers/net/nfp/nfp_cpp_bridge.h                |   2 -
> >   drivers/net/nfp/nfp_ethdev.c                    | 111
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   drivers/net/nfp/nfp_ethdev_vf.c                 |   1 +
> >   drivers/net/nfp/nfp_rxtx.c                      |   1 +
> >   10 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower.c
> > b/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower.c
> > index 3e97f5c..da96d2f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower.c
> > @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@
> >   #include <ethdev_pci.h>
> >   #include <ethdev_driver.h>
> >
> > +#include "../nfp_ctrl.h"
> >   #include "../nfp_common.h"
> >   #include "../nfp_logs.h"
> > -#include "../nfp_ctrl.h"
> >   #include "../nfp_cpp_bridge.h"
> >   #include "../nfp_rxtx.h"
> >   #include "../nfpcore/nfp_mip.h"
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_cmsg.c
> > b/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_cmsg.c
> > index 750a629..b719eb2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_cmsg.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_cmsg.c
> > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> >
> >   #include "../nfpcore/nfp_nsp.h"
> >   #include "../nfp_logs.h"
> > +#include "../nfp_ctrl.h"
> >   #include "../nfp_common.h"
> >   #include "nfp_flower.h"
> >   #include "nfp_flower_cmsg.h"
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_ctrl.c
> > b/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_ctrl.c
> > index df908ef..961ca34 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_ctrl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_ctrl.c
> > @@ -6,9 +6,9 @@
> >   #include <rte_common.h>
> >   #include <ethdev_pci.h>
> >
> > +#include "../nfp_ctrl.h"
> >   #include "../nfp_common.h"
> >   #include "../nfp_logs.h"
> > -#include "../nfp_ctrl.h"
> >   #include "../nfp_rxtx.h"
> >   #include "nfp_flower.h"
> >   #include "nfp_flower_ctrl.h"
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_representor.c
> > b/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_representor.c
> > index 0e60f50..8db73e0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_representor.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/nfp/flower/nfp_flower_representor.c
> > @@ -6,9 +6,9 @@
> >   #include <rte_common.h>
> >   #include <ethdev_pci.h>
> >
> > +#include "../nfp_ctrl.h"
> >   #include "../nfp_common.h"
> >   #include "../nfp_logs.h"
> > -#include "../nfp_ctrl.h"
> >   #include "../nfp_rxtx.h"
> >   #include "../nfpcore/nfp_mip.h"
> >   #include "../nfpcore/nfp_rtsym.h"
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/nfp/nfp_common.c
> > b/drivers/net/nfp/nfp_common.c index 07781a1..ec6a669 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/nfp/nfp_common.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/nfp/nfp_common.c
> > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
> >   #include "nfpcore/nfp_rtsym.h"
> >   #include "nfpcore/nfp_nsp.h"
> >
> > +#include "nfp_ctrl.h"
> >   #include "nfp_common.h"
> >   #include "nfp_ctrl.h"
> >   #include "nfp_rxtx.h"
> 
> Are above header inclusion changes related to this patch?

Yes, it does relate.
In this patch, we use a macro in `nfp_common.h`, and this macro is defined in `nfp_ctrl.h`,
so import the dependency relations of this two header files.
If we don't modify the related files which use these two header files, the compile process will fail.