[dpdk-dev v3] crypto/ipsec_mb: multi-process IPC request handler
De Lara Guarch, Pablo
pablo.de.lara.guarch at intel.com
Wed Oct 26 10:17:09 CEST 2022
Hi Kai,
A few comments below
Thanks,
Pablo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ji, Kai <kai.ji at intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 10:48 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: gakhil at marvell.com; Ji, Kai <kai.ji at intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> <pablo.de.lara.guarch at intel.com>; Burakov, Anatoly
> <anatoly.burakov at intel.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev v3] crypto/ipsec_mb: multi-process IPC request handler
>
> As the secondary process needs queue-pair to be configured by the primary
> process before use.
This sentence looks incomplete: as the secondary process needs...., then what?
> This patch adds an IPC register function to allow
> secondary process to setup cryptodev queue-pair via IPC messages during
> the runtime. A new "qp_in_used_pid" param stores the PID to provide the
> ownership of the queue-pair so that only the PID matched queue-pair can be
> free'd in the request.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kai Ji <kai.ji at intel.com>
> ---
>
> v3:
> - remove shared memzone as qp_conf params can be passed directly from
> ipc message.
>
> v2:
> - add in shared memzone for data exchange between multi-process
> ---
> drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/ipsec_mb_ops.c | 130
> ++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/ipsec_mb_private.c | 24 +++-
> drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/ipsec_mb_private.h | 46 ++++++++
> 3 files changed, 196 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/ipsec_mb_ops.c
> b/drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/ipsec_mb_ops.c
> index cedcaa2742..c29656b746 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/ipsec_mb_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/ipsec_mb_ops.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <string.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
>
> #include <rte_common.h>
> #include <rte_malloc.h>
> @@ -93,6 +94,46 @@ ipsec_mb_info_get(struct rte_cryptodev *dev,
> }
> }
>
> +static int
> +ipsec_mb_secondary_qp_op(int dev_id, int qp_id,
> + const struct rte_cryptodev_qp_conf *qp_conf,
> + int socket_id, uint16_t pid, enum ipsec_mb_mp_req_type
> op_type) {
> + int ret;
> + struct rte_mp_msg qp_req_msg;
> + struct rte_mp_msg *qp_resp_msg;
> + struct rte_mp_reply qp_resp;
> + struct ipsec_mb_mp_param *req_param;
> + struct ipsec_mb_mp_param *resp_param;
> + struct timespec ts = {.tv_sec = 1, .tv_nsec = 0};
> +
> + memset(&qp_req_msg, 0, sizeof(IPSEC_MB_MP_MSG));
> + memcpy(qp_req_msg.name, IPSEC_MB_MP_MSG,
> sizeof(IPSEC_MB_MP_MSG));
> + req_param = (struct ipsec_mb_mp_param *)&qp_req_msg.param;
> +
> + qp_req_msg.len_param = sizeof(struct ipsec_mb_mp_param);
> + req_param->type = op_type;
> + req_param->dev_id = dev_id;
> + req_param->qp_id = qp_id;
> + req_param->socket_id = socket_id;
> + req_param->process_id = pid;
I think you can use "get_pid()" here and not have "pid" argument in the function, as I believe it is always called within the same process.
> + if (qp_conf) {
> + req_param->nb_descriptors = qp_conf->nb_descriptors;
> + req_param->mp_session = (void *)qp_conf->mp_session;
> + }
> +
> + qp_req_msg.num_fds = 0;
> + ret = rte_mp_request_sync(&qp_req_msg, &qp_resp, &ts);
> + if (ret) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "Create MR request to primary
> process failed.");
> + return -1;
> + }
> + qp_resp_msg = &qp_resp.msgs[0];
> + resp_param = (struct ipsec_mb_mp_param *)qp_resp_msg->param;
> +
> + return resp_param->result;
> +}
> +
..
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/ipsec_mb_private.h
> b/drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/ipsec_mb_private.h
> index b56eaf061e..a2b52f808e 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/ipsec_mb_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/ipsec_mb/ipsec_mb_private.h
...
> +
> /** All supported device types */
> enum ipsec_mb_pmd_types {
> IPSEC_MB_PMD_TYPE_AESNI_MB = 0,
> @@ -149,11 +155,51 @@ struct ipsec_mb_qp {
> IMB_MGR *mb_mgr;
> /* Multi buffer manager */
> const struct rte_memzone *mb_mgr_mz;
> + /** The process id used for queue pairs **/
> + uint16_t qp_in_used_by_pid;
I would rename this to "qp_in_use_by_pid" or "qp_used_by_pid".
> /* Shared memzone for storing mb_mgr */
Check these comments. This last one "Shared memzone..." applies to the field "mb_mgr_mz".
Also, they should use "/**< ".
> __extension__ uint8_t additional_data[];
> /**< Storing PMD specific additional data */ };
>
More information about the dev
mailing list