[PATCH v3 1/4] vhost: fix vq use after free on NUMA reallocation

[Maxime Coquelin]

On 9/14/22 11:45, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 14/09/2022 11:34, Maxime Coquelin:
>>
>> On 9/14/22 11:15, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 14/09/2022 09:14, Maxime Coquelin:
>>>> On 9/14/22 03:05, Xia, Chenbo wrote:
>>>>> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
>>>>>> On 7/26/22 09:55, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>>>>> The bug this patch is fixing is being reproduced downstream.
>>>>>> It would be great it gets merged in main branch rapidly so that we can
>>>>>> perform the backport.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Chenbo, are you planning a pull request for vhost/virtio in the next few
>>>>>> days? If not, should the main branch maintainer pick this single patch
>>>>>> directly and let the rest of the series more time for reviews?
>>>>>
>>>>> Based on the status of all patches in the list, I guess PR will not happen
>>>>> this week. So it will be good if David/Thomas can directly pick up this.
>>>>
>>>> OK, sounds good to me.
>>>>
>>>> Thomas/David, is that good on your side?
>>>
>>> Is there a blocker to merge the whole series?
>>
>> No, I reviewed the whole series.
>>
>> But other patches are an enhancement, so it would not hurt to have more
>> reviews.
>>
>> I am fine either way.
> 
> I prefer not breaking series.
> How urgent is it? Should I merge it today?
> 
> 

It causes failures in some of our QE tests, so it is urgent for us.
If you prefer not breaking the series, I am fine if you take it all.

Thanks,
Maxime