[PATCH v2 01/37] baseband/acc100: add enqueue status
Maxime Coquelin
maxime.coquelin at redhat.com
Wed Sep 14 18:26:16 CEST 2022
On 8/20/22 04:31, Hernan Vargas wrote:
> Add enqueue status as part of rte_bbdev_queue_data.
> This is a new feature to update queue status and indicate the reason why
> a previous enqueue may or may not have consumed all requested operations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c b/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
> index a68a9b0fd9..7f698ec3d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc100/rte_acc100_pmd.c
> @@ -3436,6 +3436,35 @@ get_num_cbs_in_tb_ldpc_dec(struct rte_bbdev_op_ldpc_dec *ldpc_dec)
> return cbs_in_tb;
> }
>
> +static inline void
> +acc100_enqueue_status(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
> + enum rte_bbdev_enqueue_status status)
> +{
> + q_data->enqueue_status = status;
> + q_data->queue_stats.enqueue_status_count[status]++;
> + rte_bbdev_log(WARNING, "Enqueue Status: %d %#"PRIx64"",
> + status,
> + q_data->queue_stats.enqueue_status_count[status]);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +acc100_enqueue_invalid(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data)
> +{
> + acc100_enqueue_status(q_data, RTE_BBDEV_ENQ_STATUS_INVALID_OP);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +acc100_enqueue_ring_full(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data)
> +{
> + acc100_enqueue_status(q_data, RTE_BBDEV_ENQ_STATUS_RING_FULL);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void
> +acc100_enqueue_queue_full(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data)
> +{
> + acc100_enqueue_status(q_data, RTE_BBDEV_ENQ_STATUS_QUEUE_FULL);
> +}
This one is not used in this patch, is that expected?
> +
> /* Enqueue encode operations for ACC100 device in CB mode. */
> static uint16_t
> acc100_enqueue_enc_cb(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
> @@ -3449,13 +3478,17 @@ acc100_enqueue_enc_cb(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
>
> for (i = 0; i < num; ++i) {
> /* Check if there are available space for further processing */
> - if (unlikely(avail - 1 < 0))
> + if (unlikely(avail - 1 < 0)) {
> + acc100_enqueue_ring_full(q_data);
> break;
> + }
> avail -= 1;
>
> ret = enqueue_enc_one_op_cb(q, ops[i], i);
> - if (ret < 0)
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + acc100_enqueue_invalid(q_data);
> break;
> + }
> }
>
> if (unlikely(i == 0))
> @@ -3505,20 +3538,26 @@ acc100_enqueue_ldpc_enc_cb(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
> int16_t enq, left = num;
>
> while (left > 0) {
> - if (unlikely(avail < 1))
> + if (unlikely(avail < 1)) {
> + acc100_enqueue_ring_full(q_data);
> break;
> + }
> avail--;
> enq = RTE_MIN(left, ACC100_MUX_5GDL_DESC);
> if (check_mux(&ops[i], enq)) {
> ret = enqueue_ldpc_enc_n_op_cb(q, &ops[i],
> desc_idx, enq);
> - if (ret < 0)
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + acc100_enqueue_invalid(q_data);
> break;
> + }
> i += enq;
> } else {
> ret = enqueue_ldpc_enc_one_op_cb(q, ops[i], desc_idx);
> - if (ret < 0)
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + acc100_enqueue_invalid(q_data);
> break;
> + }
> i++;
> }
> desc_idx++;
> @@ -3557,13 +3596,17 @@ acc100_enqueue_enc_tb(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
> for (i = 0; i < num; ++i) {
> cbs_in_tb = get_num_cbs_in_tb_enc(&ops[i]->turbo_enc);
> /* Check if there are available space for further processing */
> - if (unlikely(avail - cbs_in_tb < 0))
> + if (unlikely(avail - cbs_in_tb < 0)) {
> + acc100_enqueue_ring_full(q_data);
> break;
> + }
> avail -= cbs_in_tb;
>
> ret = enqueue_enc_one_op_tb(q, ops[i], enqueued_cbs, cbs_in_tb);
> - if (ret < 0)
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + acc100_enqueue_invalid(q_data);
> break;
> + }
> enqueued_cbs += ret;
> }
> if (unlikely(enqueued_cbs == 0))
> @@ -3618,13 +3661,17 @@ acc100_enqueue_dec_cb(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
>
> for (i = 0; i < num; ++i) {
> /* Check if there are available space for further processing */
> - if (unlikely(avail - 1 < 0))
> + if (unlikely(avail - 1 < 0)) {
> + acc100_enqueue_ring_full(q_data);
> break;
> + }
> avail -= 1;
>
> ret = enqueue_dec_one_op_cb(q, ops[i], i);
> - if (ret < 0)
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + acc100_enqueue_invalid(q_data);
> break;
> + }
> }
>
> if (unlikely(i == 0))
> @@ -3678,8 +3725,10 @@ acc100_enqueue_ldpc_dec_tb(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
>
> ret = enqueue_ldpc_dec_one_op_tb(q, ops[i],
> enqueued_cbs, cbs_in_tb);
> - if (ret < 0)
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + acc100_enqueue_invalid(q_data);
> break;
> + }
> enqueued_cbs += ret;
> }
>
> @@ -3704,8 +3753,10 @@ acc100_enqueue_ldpc_dec_cb(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
> bool same_op = false;
> for (i = 0; i < num; ++i) {
> /* Check if there are available space for further processing */
> - if (unlikely(avail < 1))
> + if (unlikely(avail < 1)) {
> + acc100_enqueue_ring_full(q_data);
> break;
> + }
> avail -= 1;
>
> if (i > 0)
> @@ -3718,8 +3769,10 @@ acc100_enqueue_ldpc_dec_cb(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
> ops[i]->ldpc_dec.n_filler, ops[i]->ldpc_dec.cb_params.e,
> same_op);
> ret = enqueue_ldpc_dec_one_op_cb(q, ops[i], i, same_op);
> - if (ret < 0)
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + acc100_enqueue_invalid(q_data);
> break;
> + }
> }
>
> if (unlikely(i == 0))
> @@ -3755,13 +3808,17 @@ acc100_enqueue_dec_tb(struct rte_bbdev_queue_data *q_data,
> for (i = 0; i < num; ++i) {
> cbs_in_tb = get_num_cbs_in_tb_dec(&ops[i]->turbo_dec);
> /* Check if there are available space for further processing */
> - if (unlikely(avail - cbs_in_tb < 0))
> + if (unlikely(avail - cbs_in_tb < 0)) {
> + acc100_enqueue_ring_full(q_data);
> break;
> + }
> avail -= cbs_in_tb;
>
> ret = enqueue_dec_one_op_tb(q, ops[i], enqueued_cbs, cbs_in_tb);
> - if (ret < 0)
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + acc100_enqueue_invalid(q_data);
> break;
> + }
> enqueued_cbs += ret;
> }
>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
Thanks,
Maxime
More information about the dev
mailing list