[PATCH v2 34/37] baseband/acc100: update meson file sdk dependency
Maxime Coquelin
maxime.coquelin at redhat.com
Thu Sep 15 12:31:53 CEST 2022
On 8/20/22 04:31, Hernan Vargas wrote:
> Update meson files with FlexRAN SDK dependency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/baseband/acc100/meson.build | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc100/meson.build b/drivers/baseband/acc100/meson.build
> index 9a1a3b8b07..3b934a25ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/baseband/acc100/meson.build
> +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc100/meson.build
> @@ -1,6 +1,27 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> # Copyright(c) 2020 Intel Corporation
>
> +# check for FlexRAN SDK libraries
> +dep_dec5g = dependency('flexran_sdk_ldpc_decoder_5gnr', required: false)
> +
> +if dep_dec5g.found()
> + ext_deps += cc.find_library('libstdc++', required: true)
> + ext_deps += cc.find_library('libirc', required: true)
> + ext_deps += cc.find_library('libimf', required: true)
> + ext_deps += cc.find_library('libipps', required: true)
> + ext_deps += cc.find_library('libsvml', required: true)
> + ext_deps += dep_dec5g
> + ext_deps += dependency('flexran_sdk_ldpc_encoder_5gnr', required: true)
> + ext_deps += dependency('flexran_sdk_LDPC_ratematch_5gnr', required: true)
> + ext_deps += dependency('flexran_sdk_rate_dematching_5gnr', required: true)
> + ext_deps += dependency('flexran_sdk_turbo', required: true)
> + ext_deps += dependency('flexran_sdk_crc', required: true)
> + ext_deps += dependency('flexran_sdk_rate_matching', required: true)
> + ext_deps += dependency('flexran_sdk_common', required: true)
> + cflags += ['-DRTE_BBDEV_SDK_AVX2']
> + cflags += ['-DRTE_BBDEV_SDK_AVX512']
> +endif
> +
> deps += ['bbdev', 'bus_vdev', 'ring', 'pci', 'bus_pci']
>
> sources = files('rte_acc100_pmd.c')
I think we should improve build coverage with stubs.
For example, we could stub bblib_rate_dematching_5gnr(), and so all the
code under RTE_BBDEV_SDK_AVX512 ifdef in enqueue_ldpc_dec_one_op_cb()
would be built.
It would even open the possibility to have open-source implementations
of these libraries if community feel the need.
What do you think?
Thanks,
Maxime
More information about the dev
mailing list