[PATCH v3 1/5] mbuf: clarify meta data needed for Outbound Inline
Thomas Monjalon
thomas at monjalon.net
Wed Sep 21 20:46:03 CEST 2022
21/09/2022 20:21, Akhil Goyal:
> > Ping. Any thoughts on this ?
> >
> > This is just clarification of existing assumptions for Inline Outbound
> > that are being made.
> >
> >
> > On 2022-08-22 8:08 PM, Nithin Dabilpuram wrote:
> > > Clarify mbuf meta data needed for Outbound Inline processing.
> > > Application needs to provide mbuf.l3_len and L3 type in
> > > mbuf.ol_flags so that like tunnel mode using mbuf.l2_len, transport mode
> > > can make use of l3_len and l3_type to determine perform
> > > proper transport mode IPsec processing.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nithin Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram at marvell.com>
>
> Series
> Acked-by: Akhil Goyal <gakhil at marvell.com>
>
> @Thomas : Can this series be merged into crypto tree?
>
> Any objections?
That's all about crypto, so that's perfectly fine to merge in crypto tree.
More information about the dev
mailing list