[EXT] Re: [PATCH] test/crypto: add cryptodev reconfig test
Anoob Joseph
anoobj at marvell.com
Mon Apr 10 09:19:17 CEST 2023
Hi Fan,
Please see inline.
Thanks,
Anoob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang, Fan <fanzhang.oss at gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 7:51 PM
> To: Aakash Sasidharan <asasidharan at marvell.com>; Akhil Goyal
> <gakhil at marvell.com>
> Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj at marvell.com>; Anoob Joseph
> <anoobj at marvell.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] test/crypto: add cryptodev reconfig test
>
> External Email
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Hi Aakash,
>
> I really like the idea to create a test for device reconfiguration.
>
> I am wondering if we need to test all PMDs against this patch first.
[Anoob] We have tested the patch with Marvell PMDs, crypto_cn9k & crypto_cn10k as well as with openSSL PMD, cryptodev_openssl. We can wait for few days to see if any PMD owner has any objections.
Can you review the patch and see if it aligns with DPDK spec?
>
> Regards,
>
> Fan
>
> On 4/5/2023 8:41 AM, Aakash Sasidharan wrote:
> > Add cryptodev tests to verify that the device supports reconfiguration
> > any number of times via rte_cryptodev_configure API.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aakash Sasidharan <asasidharan at marvell.com>
> > ---
> > app/test/test_cryptodev.c | 81
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> > index 9c670e9a35..3376ed91a3 100644
> > --- a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> > +++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> > @@ -12368,6 +12368,85 @@ test_stats(void)
> > return TEST_SUCCESS;
> > }
> >
> > +static int
> > +test_device_reconfigure(void)
> > +{
> > + struct crypto_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
> > + uint16_t orig_nb_qps = ts_params->conf.nb_queue_pairs;
> > + struct rte_cryptodev_qp_conf qp_conf = {
> > + .nb_descriptors = MAX_NUM_OPS_INFLIGHT,
> > + .mp_session = ts_params->session_mpool
> > + };
> > + uint16_t qp_id, dev_id, num_devs = 0;
> > +
> > + TEST_ASSERT((num_devs = rte_cryptodev_count()) >= 1,
> > + "Need at least %d devices for test", 1);
> > +
> > + dev_id = ts_params->valid_devs[0];
> > +
> > + /* Stop the device in case it's started so it can be configured */
> > + rte_cryptodev_stop(dev_id);
> > +
> > + TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(rte_cryptodev_configure(dev_id, &ts_params-
> >conf),
> > + "Failed test for rte_cryptodev_configure: "
> > + "dev_num %u", dev_id);
> > +
> > + /* Reconfigure with same configure params */
> > + TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(rte_cryptodev_configure(dev_id, &ts_params-
> >conf),
> > + "Failed test for rte_cryptodev_configure: "
> > + "dev_num %u", dev_id);
> > +
> > + /* Reconfigure with just one queue pair */
> > + ts_params->conf.nb_queue_pairs = 1;
> > +
> > + TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(rte_cryptodev_configure(ts_params-
> >valid_devs[0],
> > + &ts_params->conf),
> > + "Failed to configure cryptodev: dev_id %u, qp_id %u",
> > + ts_params->valid_devs[0], ts_params-
> >conf.nb_queue_pairs);
> > +
> > + for (qp_id = 0; qp_id < ts_params->conf.nb_queue_pairs; qp_id++) {
> > + TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(rte_cryptodev_queue_pair_setup(
> > + ts_params->valid_devs[0], qp_id, &qp_conf,
> > + rte_cryptodev_socket_id(
> > + ts_params->valid_devs[0])),
> > + "Failed test for "
> > + "rte_cryptodev_queue_pair_setup:
> num_inflights "
> > + "%u on qp %u on cryptodev %u",
> > + qp_conf.nb_descriptors, qp_id,
> > + ts_params->valid_devs[0]);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Reconfigure with max number of queue pairs */
> > + ts_params->conf.nb_queue_pairs = orig_nb_qps;
> > +
> > + TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(rte_cryptodev_configure(ts_params-
> >valid_devs[0],
> > + &ts_params->conf),
> > + "Failed to configure cryptodev: dev_id %u, qp_id %u",
> > + ts_params->valid_devs[0], ts_params-
> >conf.nb_queue_pairs);
> > +
> > + qp_conf.mp_session = ts_params->session_mpool;
> > +
> > + for (qp_id = 0; qp_id < ts_params->conf.nb_queue_pairs; qp_id++) {
> > + TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(rte_cryptodev_queue_pair_setup(
> > + ts_params->valid_devs[0], qp_id, &qp_conf,
> > + rte_cryptodev_socket_id(
> > + ts_params->valid_devs[0])),
> > + "Failed test for "
> > + "rte_cryptodev_queue_pair_setup:
> num_inflights "
> > + "%u on qp %u on cryptodev %u",
> > + qp_conf.nb_descriptors, qp_id,
> > + ts_params->valid_devs[0]);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Start the device */
> > + TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(rte_cryptodev_start(ts_params->valid_devs[0]),
> > + "Failed to start cryptodev %u",
> > + ts_params->valid_devs[0]);
> > +
> > + /* Test expected values */
> > + return test_AES_CBC_HMAC_SHA1_encrypt_digest();
> > +}
> > +
> > static int MD5_HMAC_create_session(struct crypto_testsuite_params
> *ts_params,
> > struct crypto_unittest_params *ut_params,
> > enum rte_crypto_auth_operation op, @@ -
> 16022,6 +16101,8 @@
> > static struct unit_test_suite cryptodev_gen_testsuite = {
> > .suite_name = "Crypto General Unit Test Suite",
> > .setup = crypto_gen_testsuite_setup,
> > .unit_test_cases = {
> > + TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup, ut_teardown,
> > + test_device_reconfigure),
> > TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup, ut_teardown,
> > test_device_configure_invalid_dev_id),
> > TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup, ut_teardown,
More information about the dev
mailing list