[PATCH v4 2/8] eal: fixes for re-initialization issues

[Sinan Kaya]

On Tue, 2023-08-15 at 10:49 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >   
> > +     __atomic_store_n(&run_once, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> >        return 0;
> 
> 
> Interesting, other flags don't use atomic. Why here?
> 
> 
> 
> And is already set elsewhere?

Looking at the history, this variable used to be an atomic
variable. Later, it got replaced with a uint32_t and write
is done with __atomic_store_n instead. I followed other
examples in the same source code file.