[PATCH 0/7] refactor kvargs test
fengchengwen
fengchengwen at huawei.com
Tue Dec 5 03:55:22 CET 2023
Hi Thomas,
Could you please apply the commits 1~6 ? There commits are independent and could use for current code.
Thanks
On 2023/11/3 17:53, Chengwen Feng wrote:
> When developing patchset [1], I found the kvargs test is hard to
> understand when tried to add some testcase.
>
> So refactor kvargs by:
> 1. introduce UT suite framework.
> 2. extract big test_valid_kvargs() to five part.
>
> And add myself for voluntary maintenance of the kvargs library.
>
> Note: to ensure patch independenct, new API which in patchset [1]
> are not included in this patchset.
>
> [1] https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/cover/20231103073811.13196-1-fengchengwen@huawei.com/
>
> Chengwen Feng (7):
> app/test: introduce UT suite framework for kvargs
> app/test: extract basic token count testcase for kvargs
> app/test: extract without keys testcase for kvargs
> app/test: extract with keys testcase for kvargs
> app/test: extract parse list value testcase for kvargs
> app/test: extract parse empty elements testcase for kvargs
> maintainers: update for kvargs library
>
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> app/test/test_kvargs.c | 256 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 2 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-)
>
More information about the dev
mailing list