[PATCH 1/2] doc: updated incorrect value for IP frag max fragments
Bruce Richardson
bruce.richardson at intel.com
Wed Dec 20 11:03:26 CET 2023
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 10:42:28AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 19/12/2023 16:17, Euan Bourke:
> > +Each table entry can hold information about packets of up to ``RTE_LIBRTE_IP_FRAG_MAX_FRAGS`` fragments,
> > +where ``RTE_LIBRTE_IP_FRAG_MAX_FRAGS`` defaults to:
>
> Instead of repeating the name, you can use "it".
>
In this instance, I actually think it's better to repeat the name - as "it"
would read strangely, and could refer to "table entry" or "information"
either.
/Bruce
More information about the dev
mailing list