[v6] net/af_xdp: enable uds_path instead of use_cni

David Marchand david.marchand at redhat.com
Thu Dec 21 12:57:58 CET 2023


On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 12:46 PM Maryam Tahhan <mtahhan at redhat.com> wrote:
> > If there are fixes mixed in, please separate them in dedicated patches
> > so we can backport them to LTS releases.
>
> Thanks for the Feedback David, I don't quite understand the ask here, is to to have a separate patch for documentation to fixes? As previous feedback in the mailing list was to keep the documentation changes with the fix.
>
> There is one fix in this patchset (for for broken socket behaviour). The rest of the changes were fixing up all the documentation. So do I need to create a patchset with multiple patches, one for the c code and separate ones for the documentation?

Ideally yes.

If the documentation fix relates to the code fix, it shall go as one patch.
Otherwise the doc fix can go as a separate patch.
And then after those fixes, the last patch of the series would be your
enhancement change.


Thanks.

-- 
David Marchand



More information about the dev mailing list