[PATCH v16 4/6] test/memarea: support alloc and free API test

[Burakov, Anatoly]

On 7/10/2023 7:49 AM, Chengwen Feng wrote:
> This patch supports rte_memarea_alloc() and rte_memarea_free() API
> test.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen at huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3 at huawei.com>
> Acked-by: Morten Brørup <mb at smartsharesystems.com>
> ---

> +static int
> +test_memarea_free_fail(void)
> +{
> +	struct rte_memarea_param init;
> +	struct rte_memarea *ma;
> +	void *ptr;
> +
> +	test_memarea_init_param(&init);
> +	init.source = RTE_MEMAREA_SOURCE_LIBC;
> +	init.total_sz = MEMAREA_TEST_DEFAULT_SIZE;
> +	ma = rte_memarea_create(&init);
> +	TEST_ASSERT(ma != NULL, "Expected Non-NULL");
> +
> +	/* test repeat free */
> +	rte_errno = 0;
> +	ptr = rte_memarea_alloc(ma, MEMAREA_TEST_DEFAULT_SIZE >> 1);
> +	TEST_ASSERT(ptr != NULL, "Expected Non-NULL");
> +	test_memarea_fill_region(ptr, MEMAREA_TEST_DEFAULT_SIZE >> 1);
> +	rte_memarea_free(ma, ptr);
> +	TEST_ASSERT(rte_errno == 0, "Expected Zero");
> +	rte_memarea_free(ma, ptr);
> +	TEST_ASSERT(rte_errno == EFAULT, "Expected EFAULT");
> +
> +	rte_memarea_destroy(ma);
> +
> +	return 0;

Same as in other, I think TEST_SUCCESS would be more correct (even 
though DPDK codebase doesn't always follow that convention).

Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov at intel.com>
-- 
Thanks,
Anatoly