[PATCH v1 2/3] app/testpmd: add the explicit check for tunnel TSO offload
lihuisong (C)
lihuisong at huawei.com
Sat Nov 11 05:27:38 CET 2023
Hi Ferruh,
Thanks for you review so fast.
在 2023/11/11 11:30, Ferruh Yigit 写道:
> On 11/10/2023 8:19 AM, Huisong Li wrote:
>> If port don't support TSO of tunnel packets, tell user in advance and
>> no need to change other configuration of this port in case of fault spread.
>>
>> In addition, if some tunnel offloads don't support, which is not an error
>> case, the log about this shouldn't be to stderr.
>>
> Overall patch looks good to me, please check a minor comment below.
>
>> Fixes: 3926dd2b6668 ("app/testpmd: enforce offload capabilities check")
>> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong at huawei.com>
>> ---
>> app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>> index 25462bdbfc..d3243d016b 100644
>> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
>> @@ -5039,28 +5039,22 @@ static void
>> check_tunnel_tso_nic_support(portid_t port_id, uint64_t tx_offload_capa)
>> {
>> if (!(tx_offload_capa & RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_VXLAN_TNL_TSO))
>> - fprintf(stderr,
>> - "Warning: VXLAN TUNNEL TSO not supported therefore not enabled for port %d\n",
>> + printf("Warning: VXLAN TUNNEL TSO not supported therefore not enabled for port %d\n",
>> port_id);
>> if (!(tx_offload_capa & RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_GRE_TNL_TSO))
>> - fprintf(stderr,
>> - "Warning: GRE TUNNEL TSO not supported therefore not enabled for port %d\n",
>> + printf("Warning: GRE TUNNEL TSO not supported therefore not enabled for port %d\n",
>> port_id);
>> if (!(tx_offload_capa & RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_IPIP_TNL_TSO))
>> - fprintf(stderr,
>> - "Warning: IPIP TUNNEL TSO not supported therefore not enabled for port %d\n",
>> + printf("Warning: IPIP TUNNEL TSO not supported therefore not enabled for port %d\n",
>> port_id);
>> if (!(tx_offload_capa & RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_GENEVE_TNL_TSO))
>> - fprintf(stderr,
>> - "Warning: GENEVE TUNNEL TSO not supported therefore not enabled for port %d\n",
>> + printf("Warning: GENEVE TUNNEL TSO not supported therefore not enabled for port %d\n",
>> port_id);
>> if (!(tx_offload_capa & RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_IP_TNL_TSO))
>> - fprintf(stderr,
>> - "Warning: IP TUNNEL TSO not supported therefore not enabled for port %d\n",
>> + printf("Warning: IP TUNNEL TSO not supported therefore not enabled for port %d\n",
>> port_id);
>> if (!(tx_offload_capa & RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_TNL_TSO))
>> - fprintf(stderr,
>> - "Warning: UDP TUNNEL TSO not supported therefore not enabled for port %d\n",
>> + printf("Warning: UDP TUNNEL TSO not supported therefore not enabled for port %d\n",
>> port_id);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -5071,6 +5065,12 @@ cmd_tunnel_tso_set_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>> {
>> struct cmd_tunnel_tso_set_result *res = parsed_result;
>> struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info;
>> + uint64_t all_tunnel_tso = RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_VXLAN_TNL_TSO |
>> + RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_GRE_TNL_TSO |
>> + RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_IPIP_TNL_TSO |
>> + RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_GENEVE_TNL_TSO |
>> + RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_IP_TNL_TSO |
>> + RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_TNL_TSO;
>> int ret;
>>
>> if (port_id_is_invalid(res->port_id, ENABLED_WARN))
>> @@ -5087,26 +5087,21 @@ cmd_tunnel_tso_set_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>> if (ret != 0)
>> return;
>>
>> - check_tunnel_tso_nic_support(res->port_id, dev_info.tx_offload_capa);
>> + if (ports[res->port_id].tunnel_tso_segsz != 0) {
>> + if ((all_tunnel_tso & dev_info.tx_offload_capa) == 0) {
>> + fprintf(stderr, "Error: port=%u don't support tunnel TSO offloads.\n",
>> + res->port_id);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + check_tunnel_tso_nic_support(res->port_id, dev_info.tx_offload_capa);
>> + }
>> +
> Instead of having a separate if block, else leg of below if block does
> same check [1], what do you think to move above block to there?
ok, will fixed in next version.
>
>> if (ports[res->port_id].tunnel_tso_segsz == 0) {
>> - ports[res->port_id].dev_conf.txmode.offloads &=
>> - ~(RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_VXLAN_TNL_TSO |
>> - RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_GRE_TNL_TSO |
>> - RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_IPIP_TNL_TSO |
>> - RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_GENEVE_TNL_TSO |
>> - RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_IP_TNL_TSO |
>> - RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_TNL_TSO);
>> + ports[res->port_id].dev_conf.txmode.offloads &= ~all_tunnel_tso;
>> printf("TSO for tunneled packets is disabled\n");
>> } else {
>> - uint64_t tso_offloads = (RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_VXLAN_TNL_TSO |
>> - RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_GRE_TNL_TSO |
>> - RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_IPIP_TNL_TSO |
>> - RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_GENEVE_TNL_TSO |
>> - RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_IP_TNL_TSO |
>> - RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_TNL_TSO);
>> -
> [1] ---> here has same logical condition
>
>> ports[res->port_id].dev_conf.txmode.offloads |=
>> - (tso_offloads & dev_info.tx_offload_capa);
>> + (all_tunnel_tso & dev_info.tx_offload_capa);
>> printf("TSO segment size for tunneled packets is %d\n",
>> ports[res->port_id].tunnel_tso_segsz);
>>
> .
More information about the dev
mailing list