[PATCH v4 0/5] doc/features: fix some features and add new features

[lihuisong (C)]

在 2023/11/28 0:44, Ferruh Yigit 写道:
> On 11/27/2023 2:16 PM, Huisong Li wrote:
>> The support for setting RSS hash algorithm has been introduced to 23.11,
>> but doesn't add feature for it. So this series add this feature to RSS hash
>> and perfect RSS other features by the way.
>>
>> In addition, serval features or interface, like "set link up/down", "TM",
>> "link speeds" and "dump device private information" had beed supported,
>> but they are absent from the freatures list.
>>
>> ---
>>   -v4:
>>     - fix RSS releated feaures description based on Ferruh
>>     - add new features to default.ini
>>     - remove loopback patch.
>>     - move "dump device private information" to "dev ops" block.
>>
>>   -v3:
>>     - fix description of the patchset cover
>>     - remove '/features' in 'doc/features' tag for every patch.
>>     - add Acked-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen at huawei.com>
>>     - retrigger CI build because of wrong CI warning
>>
>>   -v2:
>>     - add loopback mode feature.
>>
>> Huisong Li (5):
>>    doc: fix the description of RSS related feature
>>    doc: add link up/down feature
>>    doc: add features for link speeds
>>    doc: add Traffic Manager feature
>>    doc: add dump device private information ops
>>
> As mentioned before I don't know about adding link speed feature or not,
> would like to get more comment.
ok, let us to get more comment.
it is better that we send a separated patch about link speed feature to 
discuss and get more comment.
In this way, other patch in this series also go ahead to upload.
what do you think?
>
> But for the new features added, driver .ini files also needs to be
> updated for that new feature, and drivers support it should mark the
> support.
agree.
I will add "Traffic Manager" feature to driver.ini for the supported TM 
driver.
But I'm not sure if I am supposed to do this in patch 4/5 or send 
independent patch for every supported driver.
what do you think of that?
> That is why it is best to start documenting a feature when it is first
> introduced, otherwise it is more work to update it later.
agree with you.
we should remind someone to add it to this feature doc when a new 
feature is introduced.
>
> .