[PATCH 00/32] Remove use and definition of RTE_STD_C11 macro

[Tyler Retzlaff]

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 07:34:03PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 12/08/2023 00:22, Tyler Retzlaff:
> > We now document C11 conformant compiler as a minimum, it's not necessary
> > to mark C11 feature use with __extension__ to avoid warnings.
> 
> Did you check the occurences of __extension__?

i'm aware there is more cleanup to do of __extension__ when it was used
directly instead of via the macro.

> I remember at least the case of bit-fields.
> Is there any C standard allowing them?

i'd have to see the specific example but bit-fields are often things
avoided in the standard text.

the cleanups to use C11 features will be an ongoing work in progress

ty