[PATCH v2 2/2] random: make rte_rand() thread safe for non-EAL threads

Mattias Rönnblom hofors at lysator.liu.se
Fri Sep 8 22:48:54 CEST 2023


On 2023-09-07 17:24, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Add missing locking so that if two non-EAL threads call rte_rand()
> they will not corrupt the per-thread state.
> 
> Fixes: 3f002f069612 ("eal: replace libc-based random generation with LFSR")

The API documentation clearly states that no MT safety guarantees are 
given for unregistered non-EAL threads. So this patch doesn't fix anything.

rte_rand() is MT safe for *registered* non-EAL threads.

> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>
> ---
>   lib/eal/common/rte_random.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>   1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/eal/common/rte_random.c b/lib/eal/common/rte_random.c
> index 812e5b4757b5..02b6b6b97bc0 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/common/rte_random.c
> +++ b/lib/eal/common/rte_random.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>   #include <rte_branch_prediction.h>
>   #include <rte_cycles.h>
>   #include <rte_lcore.h>
> +#include <rte_spinlock.h>
>   #include <rte_random.h>
>   
>   struct rte_rand_state {
> @@ -21,6 +22,9 @@ struct rte_rand_state {
>   	uint64_t z5;
>   } __rte_cache_aligned;
>   
> +/* Used for thread safety for non EAL threads. */
> +static rte_spinlock_t rte_rand_lock = RTE_SPINLOCK_INITIALIZER;
> +
>   /* One instance each for every lcore id-equipped thread, and one
>    * additional instance to be shared by all others threads (i.e., all
>    * unregistered non-EAL threads).
> @@ -124,20 +128,32 @@ struct rte_rand_state *__rte_rand_get_state(void)
>   	idx = rte_lcore_id();
>   
>   	/* last instance reserved for unregistered non-EAL threads */
> -	if (unlikely(idx == LCORE_ID_ANY))
> +	if (unlikely(idx == LCORE_ID_ANY)) {
>   		idx = RTE_MAX_LCORE;
> +		rte_spinlock_lock(&rte_rand_lock);

Non-EAL threads are very likely to be "regular" threads, which won't 
have a dedicated core all for themselves, and thus may well be preempted 
by the kernel. Such threads should not use spinlocks.

If a lock is to be added to achieve MT safety for parallel calls from 
unregistered non-EAL threads, it should be a regular mutex.

> +	}
>   
>   	return &rand_states[idx];
>   }
>   
> +static __rte_always_inline
> +void __rte_rand_put_state(struct rte_rand_state *state)
> +{
> +	if (state == &rand_states[RTE_MAX_LCORE])
> +		rte_spinlock_unlock(&rte_rand_lock);
> +}
> +
>   uint64_t
>   rte_rand(void)
>   {
>   	struct rte_rand_state *state;
> +	uint64_t res;
>   
>   	state = __rte_rand_get_state();
> +	res = __rte_rand_lfsr258(state);
> +	__rte_rand_put_state(state);
>   
> -	return __rte_rand_lfsr258(state);
> +	return res;
>   }
>   
>   uint64_t
> @@ -159,22 +175,24 @@ rte_rand_max(uint64_t upper_bound)
>   	/* Handle power-of-2 upper_bound as a special case, since it
>   	 * has no bias issues.
>   	 */
> -	if (unlikely(ones == 1))
> -		return __rte_rand_lfsr258(state) & (upper_bound - 1);
> -
> -	/* The approach to avoiding bias is to create a mask that
> -	 * stretches beyond the request value range, and up to the
> -	 * next power-of-2. In case the masked generated random value
> -	 * is equal to or greater than the upper bound, just discard
> -	 * the value and generate a new one.
> -	 */
> -
> -	leading_zeros = rte_clz64(upper_bound);
> -	mask >>= leading_zeros;
> -
> -	do {
> -		res = __rte_rand_lfsr258(state) & mask;
> -	} while (unlikely(res >= upper_bound));
> +	if (unlikely(ones == 1)) {
> +		res = __rte_rand_lfsr258(state) & (upper_bound - 1);
> +	} else {
> +		/* The approach to avoiding bias is to create a mask that
> +		 * stretches beyond the request value range, and up to the
> +		 * next power-of-2. In case the masked generated random value
> +		 * is equal to or greater than the upper bound, just discard
> +		 * the value and generate a new one.
> +		 */
> +
> +		leading_zeros = rte_clz64(upper_bound);
> +		mask >>= leading_zeros;
> +
> +		do {
> +			res = __rte_rand_lfsr258(state) & mask;
> +		} while (unlikely(res >= upper_bound));
> +	}
> +	__rte_rand_put_state(state);
>   
>   	return res;
>   }


More information about the dev mailing list