[PATCH v2 2/2] random: make rte_rand() thread safe for non-EAL threads
Mattias Rönnblom
hofors at lysator.liu.se
Fri Sep 8 22:48:54 CEST 2023
On 2023-09-07 17:24, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Add missing locking so that if two non-EAL threads call rte_rand()
> they will not corrupt the per-thread state.
>
> Fixes: 3f002f069612 ("eal: replace libc-based random generation with LFSR")
The API documentation clearly states that no MT safety guarantees are
given for unregistered non-EAL threads. So this patch doesn't fix anything.
rte_rand() is MT safe for *registered* non-EAL threads.
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>
> ---
> lib/eal/common/rte_random.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/eal/common/rte_random.c b/lib/eal/common/rte_random.c
> index 812e5b4757b5..02b6b6b97bc0 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/common/rte_random.c
> +++ b/lib/eal/common/rte_random.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <rte_branch_prediction.h>
> #include <rte_cycles.h>
> #include <rte_lcore.h>
> +#include <rte_spinlock.h>
> #include <rte_random.h>
>
> struct rte_rand_state {
> @@ -21,6 +22,9 @@ struct rte_rand_state {
> uint64_t z5;
> } __rte_cache_aligned;
>
> +/* Used for thread safety for non EAL threads. */
> +static rte_spinlock_t rte_rand_lock = RTE_SPINLOCK_INITIALIZER;
> +
> /* One instance each for every lcore id-equipped thread, and one
> * additional instance to be shared by all others threads (i.e., all
> * unregistered non-EAL threads).
> @@ -124,20 +128,32 @@ struct rte_rand_state *__rte_rand_get_state(void)
> idx = rte_lcore_id();
>
> /* last instance reserved for unregistered non-EAL threads */
> - if (unlikely(idx == LCORE_ID_ANY))
> + if (unlikely(idx == LCORE_ID_ANY)) {
> idx = RTE_MAX_LCORE;
> + rte_spinlock_lock(&rte_rand_lock);
Non-EAL threads are very likely to be "regular" threads, which won't
have a dedicated core all for themselves, and thus may well be preempted
by the kernel. Such threads should not use spinlocks.
If a lock is to be added to achieve MT safety for parallel calls from
unregistered non-EAL threads, it should be a regular mutex.
> + }
>
> return &rand_states[idx];
> }
>
> +static __rte_always_inline
> +void __rte_rand_put_state(struct rte_rand_state *state)
> +{
> + if (state == &rand_states[RTE_MAX_LCORE])
> + rte_spinlock_unlock(&rte_rand_lock);
> +}
> +
> uint64_t
> rte_rand(void)
> {
> struct rte_rand_state *state;
> + uint64_t res;
>
> state = __rte_rand_get_state();
> + res = __rte_rand_lfsr258(state);
> + __rte_rand_put_state(state);
>
> - return __rte_rand_lfsr258(state);
> + return res;
> }
>
> uint64_t
> @@ -159,22 +175,24 @@ rte_rand_max(uint64_t upper_bound)
> /* Handle power-of-2 upper_bound as a special case, since it
> * has no bias issues.
> */
> - if (unlikely(ones == 1))
> - return __rte_rand_lfsr258(state) & (upper_bound - 1);
> -
> - /* The approach to avoiding bias is to create a mask that
> - * stretches beyond the request value range, and up to the
> - * next power-of-2. In case the masked generated random value
> - * is equal to or greater than the upper bound, just discard
> - * the value and generate a new one.
> - */
> -
> - leading_zeros = rte_clz64(upper_bound);
> - mask >>= leading_zeros;
> -
> - do {
> - res = __rte_rand_lfsr258(state) & mask;
> - } while (unlikely(res >= upper_bound));
> + if (unlikely(ones == 1)) {
> + res = __rte_rand_lfsr258(state) & (upper_bound - 1);
> + } else {
> + /* The approach to avoiding bias is to create a mask that
> + * stretches beyond the request value range, and up to the
> + * next power-of-2. In case the masked generated random value
> + * is equal to or greater than the upper bound, just discard
> + * the value and generate a new one.
> + */
> +
> + leading_zeros = rte_clz64(upper_bound);
> + mask >>= leading_zeros;
> +
> + do {
> + res = __rte_rand_lfsr258(state) & mask;
> + } while (unlikely(res >= upper_bound));
> + }
> + __rte_rand_put_state(state);
>
> return res;
> }
More information about the dev
mailing list