[PATCH 1/2] eal: introduce x86 processor identification
Bruce Richardson
bruce.richardson at intel.com
Fri Sep 22 12:38:38 CEST 2023
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 11:37:20AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> In some really specific cases, it may be needed to get a detailed
> information on the processor running a DPDK application for drivers to
> achieve better performance, or for matters that concern only them.
>
> Those information are highly arch-specific and require a specific API.
>
> Introduce a set of functions to get brand, family and model of a x86
> processor.
> Those functions do not make sense on other arches and a
> driver must first check rte_cpu_is_x86() before anything else.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>
> ---
Couple of thoughts, having had a few minutes to process this.
* Rather than rte_cpu_is_x86() API, we could go a general API called
rte_cpu_arch() which returns either a string, or an enum value. Within
that, rather than #ifdefs, the actual return value could just be a define
placed by meson in the rte_build_config.h file. The list of families
according to meson are [1] - we'd just need to merge the 32 and 64-bit
variants into one in the meson file.
* Similarly rather than having is_intel or is_amd functions, we could
generalize to a "manufacturer" API, which could be applicable for other
architectures too.
/Bruce
[1] https://mesonbuild.com/Reference-tables.html#cpu-families
More information about the dev
mailing list