[PATCH] eventdev/eth_rx: fix timestamp field register in mbuf
Naga Harish K, S V
s.v.naga.harish.k at intel.com
Mon Sep 25 12:18:05 CEST 2023
As per the DPDK contribution guidelines,
Ideally, the review should be done within 1 week of patch submission to the mailing list.
https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/contributing/patches.html
Surprised to see this review request ping message the very next day of the patch.
Better to follow the contribution guidelines.
-Harish
________________________________
From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk at gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2023 9:59 PM
To: Rahul Bhansali <rbhansali at marvell.com>
Cc: dev at dpdk.org <dev at dpdk.org>; Naga Harish K, S V <s.v.naga.harish.k at intel.com>; Jerin Jacob <jerinj at marvell.com>; Kundapura, Ganapati <Ganapati.Kundapura at intel.com>; stable at dpdk.org <stable at dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eventdev/eth_rx: fix timestamp field register in mbuf
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 6:46 PM Rahul Bhansali <rbhansali at marvell.com> wrote:
>
> For eventdev internal port, timestamp dynamic field registration
> in mbuf is not required as that will be done from net device.
> For SW eventdev, Rx timestamp field registration will be
> done during Rx queue add operation as per device capabilities and
> offload configuration.
>
> Fixes: 83ab470d1259 ("eventdev/eth_rx: use timestamp as dynamic mbuf field")
> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Rahul Bhansali <rbhansali at marvell.com>
Ping for review from maintainer.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/attachments/20230925/82c34895/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the dev
mailing list