[PATCH v2] eal/linux: enhanced error handling for affinity

[Jianyue Wu]

Yes, agree with that, there is also trace from kernel can see that. I'll ignore this patch.


At 2024-04-27 08:18:53, "Stephen Hemminger" <stephen at networkplumber.org> wrote:
>On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 08:47:37 -0700
>Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla at linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>> >  int
>> > --   
>> 
>> i do not think introducing os specific behavior/logging to the EAL
>> is a good idea. logging although not formally part of the api surface
>> should present the same experience for all platforms. the EAL should
>> have a higher standard here.
>> 
>> > 2.34.1  
>
>For this case, the error message would be better if there was some way
>to look at the cgroups and mark the cores that are not available as if
>they were offline lcores.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/attachments/20240428/13db2880/attachment.htm>