[PATCH v2 1/1] dts: add text parser for testpmd verbose output

[Luca Vizzarro]

On 30/07/2024 22:33, Jeremy Spewock wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 9:37 AM <jspewock at iol.unh.edu> wrote:
> <snip>
>> +class VerboseOLFlag(Flag):
>> +    """Flag representing the OL flags of a packet from Testpmd verbose output."""
>> +
>> +    #:
>> +    RTE_MBUF_F_RX_RSS_HASH = auto()
>> +
>> +    #:
>> +    RTE_MBUF_F_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD = auto()
>> +    #:
>> +    RTE_MBUF_F_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD = auto()
>> +    #:
>> +    RTE_MBUF_F_RX_L4_CKSUM_UNKNOWN = auto()
>> +
>> +    #:
>> +    RTE_MBUF_F_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD = auto()
>> +    #:
>> +    RTE_MBUF_F_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD = auto()
>> +    #:
>> +    RTE_MBUF_F_RX_IP_CKSUM_UNKNOWN = auto()
>> +
>> +    #:
>> +    RTE_MBUF_F_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_GOOD = auto()
>> +    #:
>> +    RTE_MBUF_F_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_BAD = auto()
>> +    #:
>> +    RTE_MBUF_F_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_UNKNOWN = auto()
>> +
> After reading more of the API and using this patch to write a test
> suite, I believe there is more expansion of these OL flags that should
> take place. For starters, there are the Tx OL flags that, while not
> seeming to be very useful for the current test suites we are writing,
> wouldn't hurt to also include as they seem to be fairly different.
> Additionally, there are some other less common RX OL flags that should
> be included here just to cover all options. I will work on adding
> these into the next version.

If you wanted to cover even more, hw_ptype and sw_ptype look like they 
could use a data structure. I reckon a flag like the above would also work.