[PATCH 2/5] eal: add unit tests for bit operations
Mattias Rönnblom
hofors at lysator.liu.se
Fri Aug 9 17:37:08 CEST 2024
On 2024-08-09 17:03, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 11:04:36 +0200
> Mattias Rönnblom <mattias.ronnblom at ericsson.com> wrote:
>
>> -uint32_t val32;
>> -uint64_t val64;
>> +#define GEN_TEST_BIT_ACCESS(test_name, set_fun, clear_fun, assign_fun, \
>> + flip_fun, test_fun, size) \
>> + static int \
>> + test_name(void) \
>> + { \
>> + uint ## size ## _t reference = (uint ## size ## _t)rte_rand(); \
>> + unsigned int bit_nr; \
>> + uint ## size ## _t word = (uint ## size ## _t)rte_rand(); \
>> + \
>> + for (bit_nr = 0; bit_nr < size; bit_nr++) { \
>> + bool reference_bit = (reference >> bit_nr) & 1; \
>> + bool assign = rte_rand() & 1; \
>> + if (assign) \
>> + assign_fun(&word, bit_nr, reference_bit); \
>> + else { \
>> + if (reference_bit) \
>> + set_fun(&word, bit_nr); \
>> + else \
>> + clear_fun(&word, bit_nr); \
>> + \
>> + } \
>> + TEST_ASSERT(test_fun(&word, bit_nr) == reference_bit, \
>> + "Bit %d had unexpected value", bit_nr); \
>> + flip_fun(&word, bit_nr); \
>> + TEST_ASSERT(test_fun(&word, bit_nr) != reference_bit, \
>> + "Bit %d had unflipped value", bit_nr); \
>> + flip_fun(&word, bit_nr); \
>> + \
>> + const uint ## size ## _t *const_ptr = &word; \
>> + TEST_ASSERT(test_fun(const_ptr, bit_nr) == \
>> + reference_bit, \
>> + "Bit %d had unexpected value", bit_nr); \
>> + } \
>> + \
>> + for (bit_nr = 0; bit_nr < size; bit_nr++) { \
>> + bool reference_bit = (reference >> bit_nr) & 1; \
>> + TEST_ASSERT(test_fun(&word, bit_nr) == reference_bit, \
>> + "Bit %d had unexpected value", bit_nr); \
>> + } \
>> + \
>> + TEST_ASSERT(reference == word, "Word had unexpected value"); \
>> + \
>> + return TEST_SUCCESS; \
>> + }
>> +
>> +GEN_TEST_BIT_ACCESS(test_bit_access32, rte_bit_set, rte_bit_clear,
>> + rte_bit_assign, rte_bit_flip, rte_bit_test, 32)
>> +
>> +GEN_TEST_BIT_ACCESS(test_bit_access64, rte_bit_set, rte_bit_clear,
>> + rte_bit_assign, rte_bit_flip, rte_bit_test, 64)
>
> Having large macro like this for two cases adds complexity without
> additional clarity. Just duplicate the code please.
GEN_TEST_BIT_ACCESS is being used by six more test cases in later
patches in the series.
More information about the dev
mailing list