[PATCH 1/4] ethdev: introduce encap hash calculation
Thomas Monjalon
thomas at monjalon.net
Tue Feb 6 23:39:30 CET 2024
28/01/2024 10:39, Ori Kam:
> During the encapsulation of a packet, it is expected to calculate the
> hash value which is based on the original packet (the outer values,
> which will become the inner values).
It is not clear what the hash is for.
> The tunnel protocol defines which tunnel field should hold this hash,
> but it doesn't define the hash calculation algorithm.
If the hash is stored in the packet header,
I expect it to be reproducible when being checked.
How the algorithm may be undefined?
> An application that uses flow offloads gets the first few packets
> and then decides to offload the flow. As a result, there are two
> different paths that a packet from a given flow may take.
> SW for the first few packets or HW for the rest.
> When the packet goes through the SW, the SW encapsulates the packet
> and must use the same hash calculation as the HW will do for
> the rest of the packets in this flow.
>
> This patch gives the SW a way to query the hash value
> for a given packet as if the packet was passed through the HW.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ori Kam <orika at nvidia.com>
> ---
> +Calculate encap hash
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +Calculating hash of a packet in SW as it would be calculated in HW for the encap action
We should give the real full name of the flow action.
> +
> +When the HW execute an encapsulation action, it may calculate an hash value which is based
> +on the original packet. This hash is stored depending on the encapsulation protocol, in one
> +of the outer fields.
Give an example of such encapsulation protocol?
> +This function allows the application to calculate the hash for a given packet as if the
> +encapsulation was done in HW.
> +
> +.. code-block:: c
> +
> + int
> + rte_flow_calc_encap_hash(uint16_t port_id,
> + const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
> + enum rte_flow_encap_hash_field dest_field,
> + uint8_t hash_len,
> + uint8_t *hash,
> + struct rte_flow_error *error);
I don't think we should add the complete prototype in this guide.
[...]
> +/**
> + * @warning
> + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice.
> + *
> + * Simulates HW hash calculation that is done when encap action is being used.
s/Simulates/Simulate/
> + *
> + * @param[in] port_id
> + * Port identifier of Ethernet device.
> + * @param[in] pattern
> + * The values to be used in the hash calculation.
> + * @param[in] dest_field
> + * Type of destination field for hash calculation.
> + * @param[in] hash_len
> + * The length of the hash pointer in bytes. Should be according to encap_hash_field.
> + * @param[out] hash
> + * Used to return the calculated hash. It will be written in network order,
> + * so hash[0] is the MSB.
> + * The number of bytes is based on the destination field type.
> + * @param[out] error
> + * Perform verbose error reporting if not NULL.
> + * PMDs initialize this structure in case of error only.
> + *
> + * @return
> + * - (0) if success.
> + * - (-ENODEV) if *port_id* invalid.
> + * - (-ENOTSUP) if underlying device does not support this functionality.
> + * - (-EINVAL) if *pattern* doesn't hold enough information to calculate the hash
> + * or the dest is not supported.
> + */
> +__rte_experimental
> +int
> +rte_flow_calc_encap_hash(uint16_t port_id, const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
> + enum rte_flow_encap_hash_field dest_field, uint8_t hash_len,
> + uint8_t *hash, struct rte_flow_error *error);
More information about the dev
mailing list