[PATCH v6 0/6] changes for 24.03

[Vargas, Hernan]

Hi Maxime,

I just submitted v7 of this series rebased on top of next-baseband.

Thanks,
Hernan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2024 4:45 AM
> To: Vargas, Hernan <hernan.vargas at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org;
> gakhil at marvell.com; Rix, Tom <trix at redhat.com>
> Cc: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chautru at intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] changes for 24.03
> 
> 
> 
> On 2/7/24 18:13, Hernan Vargas wrote:
> > v6: Rework total_num_queues in separate commit. Fix typo in comment.
> > v5: Created separate commit for doc fix. Cosmetic uppercase changes.
> > v4: Targeting 24.03. Updated FPGA PMD based on review comments.
> > v3: Made changes requested during review.
> > v2: Targeting 23.11. Update in commits 1,2 based on review comments.
> > v1: Targeting 23.07 if possible. Add support for AGX100 (N6000) and corner
> case fixes.
> >
> > Hernan Vargas (6):
> >    doc: fix fpga 5gnr configuration values
> >    baseband/fpga_5gnr_fec: renaming for consistency
> >    baseband/fpga_5gnr_fec: add Vista Creek variant
> >    baseband/fpga_5gnr_fec: rework total number queues
> >    baseband/fpga_5gnr_fec: add AGX100 support
> >    baseband/fpga_5gnr_fec: cosmetic comment changes
> >
> >   doc/guides/bbdevs/fpga_5gnr_fec.rst           |   76 +-
> >   drivers/baseband/fpga_5gnr_fec/agx100_pmd.h   |  273 ++
> >   .../baseband/fpga_5gnr_fec/fpga_5gnr_fec.h    |  353 +--
> >   .../fpga_5gnr_fec/rte_fpga_5gnr_fec.c         | 2270 ++++++++++++-----
> >   .../fpga_5gnr_fec/rte_pmd_fpga_5gnr_fec.h     |   27 +-
> >   drivers/baseband/fpga_5gnr_fec/vc_5gnr_pmd.h  |  139 +
> >   6 files changed, 2204 insertions(+), 934 deletions(-)
> >   create mode 100644 drivers/baseband/fpga_5gnr_fec/agx100_pmd.h
> >   create mode 100644 drivers/baseband/fpga_5gnr_fec/vc_5gnr_pmd.h
> >
> 
> The series does not apply, and 3-way merge does not work.
> could you please rebase on top of next-baseband?
> 
> Thanks,
> Maxime