[PATCH v11] net/iavf: add diagnostic support in TX path
Burakov, Anatoly
anatoly.burakov at intel.com
Fri Feb 9 15:43:47 CET 2024
On 1/10/2024 3:25 AM, Mingjin Ye wrote:
> Implemented a Tx wrapper to perform a thorough check on mbufs,
> categorizing and counting invalid cases by types for diagnostic
> purposes. The count of invalid cases is accessible through xstats_get.
>
> Also, the devarg option "mbuf_check" was introduced to configure the
> diagnostic parameters to enable the appropriate diagnostic features.
>
> supported cases: mbuf, size, segment, offload.
> 1. mbuf: check for corrupted mbuf.
> 2. size: check min/max packet length according to hw spec.
> 3. segment: check number of mbuf segments not exceed hw limitation.
> 4. offload: check any unsupported offload flag.
>
> parameter format: "mbuf_check=<case>" or "mbuf_check=[<case1>,<case2>]"
> eg: dpdk-testpmd -a 0000:81:01.0,mbuf_check=[mbuf,size] -- -i
>
> Signed-off-by: Mingjin Ye <mingjinx.ye at intel.com>
> ---
<snip>
>
> diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/intel_vf.rst b/doc/guides/nics/intel_vf.rst
> index ce96c2e1f8..f62bb4233c 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/nics/intel_vf.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/nics/intel_vf.rst
> @@ -111,6 +111,17 @@ For more detail on SR-IOV, please refer to the following documents:
> by setting the ``devargs`` parameter like ``-a 18:01.0,no-poll-on-link-down=1``
> when IAVF is backed by an Intel\ |reg| E810 device or an Intel\ |reg| 700 Series Ethernet device.
>
> + When IAVF is backed by an Intel\ |reg| E810 device or an Intel\ |reg| 700 series Ethernet devices.
This looks like a duplicate line of the one above it, so probably needs
to be removed?
> + Set the ``devargs`` parameter ``mbuf_check`` to enable TX diagnostics. For example,
> + ``-a 18:01.0,mbuf_check=<case>`` or ``-a 18:01.0,mbuf_check=[<case1>,<case2>...]``. Also,
> + ``xstats_get`` can be used to get the error counts, which are collected in ``tx_mbuf_error_packets``
> + xstats. For example, ``testpmd> show port xstats all``. Supported cases:
> +
> + * mbuf: Check for corrupted mbuf.
> + * size: Check min/max packet length according to hw spec.
> + * segment: Check number of mbuf segments not exceed hw limitation.
> + * offload: Check any unsupported offload flag.
> +
<snip>
> +
> + int ret = 0;
> + uint64_t *mc_flags = args;
> + char *str2 = strdup(value);
> + if (str2 == NULL)
> + return -1;
> +
> + str_len = strlen(str2);
> + if (str2[0] == '[' && str2[str_len - 1] == ']') {
> + if (str_len < 3) {
> + ret = -1;
> + goto mdd_end;
> + }
> + valid_len = str_len - 2;
> + memmove(str2, str2 + 1, valid_len);
> + memset(str2 + valid_len, '\0', 2);
> + }
I would suggest adding a comment mentioning that we're removing outer
square brackets from the value. Even better would be to factor it out
into a separate function, so that code for this function is not polluted
with implementation details of brackets removal.
> + cur = strtok_r(str2, ",", &tmp);
> + while (cur != NULL) {
> + if (!strcmp(cur, "mbuf"))
> + *mc_flags |= IAVF_MBUF_CHECK_F_TX_MBUF;
> + else if (!strcmp(cur, "size"))
> + *mc_flags |= IAVF_MBUF_CHECK_F_TX_SIZE;
> + else if (!strcmp(cur, "segment"))
> + *mc_flags |= IAVF_MBUF_CHECK_F_TX_SEGMENT;
> + else if (!strcmp(cur, "offload"))
> + *mc_flags |= IAVF_MBUF_CHECK_F_TX_OFFLOAD;
> + else
> + PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Unsupported mdd check type: %s", cur);
I suspect 'mdd' is an artifact of earlier versions? What does it mean,
and can the error message be made more meaningful?
> + cur = strtok_r(NULL, ",", &tmp);
> + }
> +
> +mdd_end:
> + free(str2);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int iavf_parse_devargs(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> {
> struct iavf_adapter *ad =
> @@ -2344,6 +2411,11 @@ static int iavf_parse_devargs(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> goto bail;
> }
>
<snip>
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (pkt_error) {
> + txq->mbuf_errors++;
> + good_pkts = idx;
> + if (good_pkts == 0)
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + return iavf_tx_pkt_burst_ops[tx_burst_type](tx_queue,
> + tx_pkts, good_pkts);
The indentation here is a bit odd.
The above suggestions are not blocking, so overall
Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov at intel.com>
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
More information about the dev
mailing list