[PATCH v2] app/dma-perf: replace pktmbuf with mempool objects
fengchengwen
fengchengwen at huawei.com
Mon Feb 26 03:05:18 CET 2024
Hi Vipin,
On 2023/12/20 19:03, Vipin Varghese wrote:
> From: Vipin Varghese <Vipin.Varghese at amd.com>
>
> Replace pktmbuf pool with mempool, this allows increase in MOPS
> especially in lower buffer size. Using Mempool, allows to reduce
> the extra CPU cycles.
>
> Changes made are
> 1. pktmbuf pool create with mempool create.
> 2. create src & dst pointer array from the appropaite numa.
> 3. use get pool and put for mempool objects.
> 4. remove pktmbuf_mtod for dma and cpu memcpy.
>
> v2 changes:
> - add ACK from Morten Brørup
>
> v1 changes:
> - pktmbuf pool create with mempool create.
> - create src & dst pointer array from the appropaite numa.
> - use get pool and put for mempool objects.
> - remove pktmbuf_mtod for dma and cpu memcpy.
>
> Test Results for pktmbuf vs mempool:
> ====================================
>
> Format: Buffer Size | % AVG cycles | % AVG Gbps
>
> Category-1: HW-DSA
> -------------------
> 64|-13.11| 14.97
> 128|-41.49| 0.41
> 256| -1.85| 1.20
> 512| -9.38| 8.81
> 1024| 1.82| -2.00
> 1518| 0.00| -0.80
> 2048| 1.03| -0.91
> 4096| 0.00| -0.35
> 8192| 0.07| -0.08
>
> Category-2: MEMCPY
> -------------------
> 64|-12.50|14.14
> 128|-40.63|67.26
> 256|-38.78|59.35
> 512|-30.26|43.36
> 1024|-21.80|27.04
> 1518|-16.23|19.33
> 2048|-14.75|16.81
> 4096| -9.56|10.01
> 8192| -3.32| 3.12
>
> Signed-off-by: Vipin Varghese <vipin.varghese at amd.com>
> Acked-by: Morten Brørup <mb at smartsharesystems.com>
> Tested-by: Thiyagrajan P <thiyagarajan.p at amd.com>
> ---
> ---
> app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
> index 9b1f58c78c..dc6f16cc01 100644
> --- a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
> +++ b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
> @@ -43,8 +43,8 @@ struct lcore_params {
> uint16_t kick_batch;
> uint32_t buf_size;
> uint16_t test_secs;
> - struct rte_mbuf **srcs;
> - struct rte_mbuf **dsts;
> + void **srcs;
> + void **dsts;
> volatile struct worker_info worker_info;
> };
>
> @@ -110,17 +110,17 @@ output_result(uint8_t scenario_id, uint32_t lcore_id, char *dma_name, uint16_t r
> }
>
> static inline void
> -cache_flush_buf(__rte_unused struct rte_mbuf **array,
> +cache_flush_buf(__rte_unused void **array,
> __rte_unused uint32_t buf_size,
> __rte_unused uint32_t nr_buf)
> {
> #ifdef RTE_ARCH_X86_64
> char *data;
> - struct rte_mbuf **srcs = array;
> + void **srcs = array;
> uint32_t i, offset;
>
> for (i = 0; i < nr_buf; i++) {
> - data = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(srcs[i], char *);
> + data = (char *) srcs[i];
> for (offset = 0; offset < buf_size; offset += 64)
> __builtin_ia32_clflush(data + offset);
> }
> @@ -224,8 +224,8 @@ do_dma_mem_copy(void *p)
> const uint32_t nr_buf = para->nr_buf;
> const uint16_t kick_batch = para->kick_batch;
> const uint32_t buf_size = para->buf_size;
> - struct rte_mbuf **srcs = para->srcs;
> - struct rte_mbuf **dsts = para->dsts;
> + void **srcs = para->srcs;
> + void **dsts = para->dsts;
> uint16_t nr_cpl;
> uint64_t async_cnt = 0;
> uint32_t i;
> @@ -241,8 +241,12 @@ do_dma_mem_copy(void *p)
> while (1) {
> for (i = 0; i < nr_buf; i++) {
> dma_copy:
> - ret = rte_dma_copy(dev_id, 0, rte_mbuf_data_iova(srcs[i]),
> - rte_mbuf_data_iova(dsts[i]), buf_size, 0);
> + ret = rte_dma_copy(dev_id,
> + 0,
> + (rte_iova_t) srcs[i],
> + (rte_iova_t) dsts[i],
should consider IOVA != VA, so here should be with rte_mempool_virt2iova(),
but this commit is mainly to eliminate the address convert overload, so we
should prepare IOVA for DMA copy, and VA for memory copy.
I prefer keep pkt_mbuf, but new add two field, and create this two field when setup_memory_env(),
then direct use them in do_xxx_mem_copy。
Thanks.
> + buf_size,
> + 0);
> if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
> if (ret == -ENOSPC) {
> do_dma_submit_and_poll(dev_id, &async_cnt, worker_info);
> @@ -276,8 +280,8 @@ do_cpu_mem_copy(void *p)
> volatile struct worker_info *worker_info = &(para->worker_info);
> const uint32_t nr_buf = para->nr_buf;
> const uint32_t buf_size = para->buf_size;
> - struct rte_mbuf **srcs = para->srcs;
> - struct rte_mbuf **dsts = para->dsts;
> + void **srcs = para->srcs;
> + void **dsts = para->dsts;
> uint32_t i;
>
> worker_info->stop_flag = false;
> @@ -288,8 +292,8 @@ do_cpu_mem_copy(void *p)
>
> while (1) {
> for (i = 0; i < nr_buf; i++) {
> - const void *src = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(dsts[i], void *);
> - void *dst = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(srcs[i], void *);
> + const void *src = (void *) dsts[i];
> + void *dst = (void *) srcs[i];
>
> /* copy buffer form src to dst */
> rte_memcpy(dst, src, (size_t)buf_size);
> @@ -303,8 +307,8 @@ do_cpu_mem_copy(void *p)
> }
>
> static int
> -setup_memory_env(struct test_configure *cfg, struct rte_mbuf ***srcs,
> - struct rte_mbuf ***dsts)
> +setup_memory_env(struct test_configure *cfg, void ***srcs,
> + void ***dsts)
> {
> unsigned int buf_size = cfg->buf_size.cur;
> unsigned int nr_sockets;
> @@ -317,47 +321,57 @@ setup_memory_env(struct test_configure *cfg, struct rte_mbuf ***srcs,
> return -1;
> }
>
> - src_pool = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create("Benchmark_DMA_SRC",
> + src_pool = rte_mempool_create("Benchmark_DMA_SRC",
> nr_buf,
> + buf_size,
> 0,
> 0,
> - buf_size + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM,
> - cfg->src_numa_node);
> + NULL,
> + NULL,
> + NULL,
> + NULL,
> + cfg->src_numa_node,
> + RTE_MEMPOOL_F_SP_PUT | RTE_MEMPOOL_F_SC_GET);
> if (src_pool == NULL) {
> PRINT_ERR("Error with source mempool creation.\n");
> return -1;
> }
>
> - dst_pool = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create("Benchmark_DMA_DST",
> + dst_pool = rte_mempool_create("Benchmark_DMA_DST",
> nr_buf,
> + buf_size,
> 0,
> 0,
> - buf_size + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM,
> - cfg->dst_numa_node);
> + NULL,
> + NULL,
> + NULL,
> + NULL,
> + cfg->dst_numa_node,
> + RTE_MEMPOOL_F_SP_PUT | RTE_MEMPOOL_F_SC_GET);
> if (dst_pool == NULL) {
> PRINT_ERR("Error with destination mempool creation.\n");
> return -1;
> }
>
> - *srcs = rte_malloc(NULL, nr_buf * sizeof(struct rte_mbuf *), 0);
> + *srcs = rte_malloc_socket(NULL, nr_buf * sizeof(unsigned char *), 0, cfg->src_numa_node);
> if (*srcs == NULL) {
> printf("Error: srcs malloc failed.\n");
> return -1;
> }
>
> - *dsts = rte_malloc(NULL, nr_buf * sizeof(struct rte_mbuf *), 0);
> + *dsts = rte_malloc_socket(NULL, nr_buf * sizeof(unsigned char *), 0, cfg->dst_numa_node);
> if (*dsts == NULL) {
> printf("Error: dsts malloc failed.\n");
> return -1;
> }
>
> - if (rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk(src_pool, *srcs, nr_buf) != 0) {
> - printf("alloc src mbufs failed.\n");
> + if (rte_mempool_get_bulk(src_pool, *srcs, nr_buf) != 0) {
> + printf("alloc src bufs failed.\n");
> return -1;
> }
>
> - if (rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk(dst_pool, *dsts, nr_buf) != 0) {
> - printf("alloc dst mbufs failed.\n");
> + if (rte_mempool_get_bulk(dst_pool, *dsts, nr_buf) != 0) {
> + printf("alloc dst bufs failed.\n");
> return -1;
> }
>
> @@ -370,7 +384,7 @@ mem_copy_benchmark(struct test_configure *cfg, bool is_dma)
> uint16_t i;
> uint32_t offset;
> unsigned int lcore_id = 0;
> - struct rte_mbuf **srcs = NULL, **dsts = NULL;
> + void **srcs = NULL, **dsts = NULL;
> struct lcore_dma_map_t *ldm = &cfg->lcore_dma_map;
> unsigned int buf_size = cfg->buf_size.cur;
> uint16_t kick_batch = cfg->kick_batch.cur;
> @@ -478,9 +492,9 @@ mem_copy_benchmark(struct test_configure *cfg, bool is_dma)
> out:
> /* free mbufs used in the test */
> if (srcs != NULL)
> - rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(srcs, nr_buf);
> + rte_mempool_put_bulk(src_pool, srcs, nr_buf);
> if (dsts != NULL)
> - rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(dsts, nr_buf);
> + rte_mempool_put_bulk(dst_pool, dsts, nr_buf);
>
> /* free the points for the mbufs */
> rte_free(srcs);
>
More information about the dev
mailing list