[PATCH v3 01/17] net/ntnic: Add registers for NapaTech SmartNiC

Ferruh Yigit ferruh.yigit at amd.com
Wed Jun 12 10:55:19 CEST 2024


On 6/12/2024 9:50 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 6/7/2024 2:03 PM, Serhii Iliushyk wrote:
> 
> Moved down. Please don't top post.
> 
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* Mykola Kostenok <mko-plv at napatech.com>
>> *Sent:* 04 June 2024 13:29
>> *To:* Serhii Iliushyk <sil-plv at napatech.com>; dev at dpdk.org <dev at dpdk.org>
>> *Cc:* Christian Koue Muf <ckm at napatech.com>;
>> andrew.rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru <andrew.rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru>;
>> ferruh.yigit at amd.com <ferruh.yigit at amd.com>
>> *Subject:* RE: [PATCH v3 01/17] net/ntnic: Add registers for NapaTech
>> SmartNiC
>>  
>> Recheck-request: iol-unit-amd64-testing, iol-compile-amd64-testing,
>> iol-unit-arm64-testing, iol-compile-arm64-testing
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Serhii Iliushyk <sil-plv at napatech.com>
>>> Sent: Monday, June 3, 2024 7:18 PM
>>> To: dev at dpdk.org
>>> Cc: Mykola Kostenok <mko-plv at napatech.com>; Christian Koue Muf
>>> <ckm at napatech.com>; andrew.rybchenko at oktetlabs.ru;
>>> ferruh.yigit at amd.com
>>> Subject: [PATCH v3 01/17] net/ntnic: Add registers for NapaTech SmartNiC
>>>
>>> The NTNIC PMD does not rely on a kernel space Napatech driver,
>>> thus all defines related to the register layout is part of the PMD
>>> code, which will be added in later commits.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Serhii Iliushyk <sil-plv at napatech.com>
>>> ---
>>>   .../supported/nthw_fpga_9563_055_039_0000.c   | 3488
>>
>> Hi Ferruh,
>>
>> We have sent a patch set which includes base PMD driver for NapaTech
>> smartNiC for DPDK v24.07.
>>
>> This time, driver has limited basic functionality(Link up only) and we
>> have made refactoring to split it into smaller patches.
>> Extended functionality is planned for upstream to the next release DPDK
>> 24.11.
>>
>> Patches have passed the CI but there are several code style warnings
>> which we assumed as false-positive.
>> Could you please take a look at these patches and suggest us how we can
>> procced with it?
>>
>>

<...>

> 
> 
> Btw, I can see some of the checkpatch warnings are valid, can you please
> go through them?
> 

Can you also run './devtools/check-git-log.sh' and fix reported issues?
I can see a few places it will complain.


More information about the dev mailing list