[PATCH v1 2/9] test/bbdev: fix MLD output size computation

[Maxime Coquelin]

On 4/22/24 21:07, Hernan Vargas wrote:
> For perf tests, the operation size for the MLD-TS was incorrect.
> Fixed so that the performance numbers are correct.
> Largely cosmetic only.
> 
> Fixes: 95f192a40e35 ("test/bbdev: add MLD cases")
> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas at intel.com>
> ---
>   app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 10 ++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> index efd046984d58..9ed0c4648d24 100644
> --- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> +++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
> @@ -2896,8 +2896,14 @@ calc_fft_size(struct rte_bbdev_fft_op *op)
>   static uint32_t
>   calc_mldts_size(struct rte_bbdev_mldts_op *op)
>   {
> -	uint32_t output_size;
> -	output_size = op->mldts.num_layers * op->mldts.num_rbs * op->mldts.c_rep;
> +	uint32_t output_size = 0;
> +	uint16_t i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < op->mldts.num_layers; i++)
> +		output_size += op->mldts.q_m[i];
> +
> +	output_size *= 12 * 8 * op->mldts.num_rbs * (op->mldts.c_rep + 1);

Could you please explain what these numbers (12, 8) relate to?
Maybe some defines are needed so that it is self-explanatory.

Thanks,
Maxime

> +
>   	return output_size;
>   }
>