[PATCH v2] app/dma-perf: calrify incorrect NUMA config

[Vipin Varghese]

In case incorrect NUMA configuration, the current commit shares
 1) either `source or destination numa is greater`
 2) instead of `actual NUMA` it is `acture NUMA`

Current changes helps to rectify the same by using `PRINT_ERR` instead
of printf.

Signed-off-by: Vipin Varghese <vipin.varghese at amd.com>

Changes:
 - inform incorrect numa
 - fix spelling from acture to actual
 - use PRINT_ERR instead of printf

---
---
 app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c | 11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
index 9b1f58c78c..b6d0dbe4c0 100644
--- a/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
+++ b/app/test-dma-perf/benchmark.c
@@ -311,9 +311,14 @@ setup_memory_env(struct test_configure *cfg, struct rte_mbuf ***srcs,
 	uint32_t nr_buf = cfg->nr_buf;
 
 	nr_sockets = rte_socket_count();
-	if (cfg->src_numa_node >= nr_sockets ||
-		cfg->dst_numa_node >= nr_sockets) {
-		printf("Error: Source or destination numa exceeds the acture numa nodes.\n");
+
+	bool isSrcNumaIncorrect = (cfg->src_numa_node >= nr_sockets);
+	bool isDstNumaIncorrect = (cfg->dst_numa_node >= nr_sockets);
+
+	if (isSrcNumaIncorrect || isDstNumaIncorrect) {
+		PRINT_ERR("Error: NUMA config exceeds the actual numa nodes for %s.\n",
+			(isSrcNumaIncorrect && isDstNumaIncorrect) ? "Source & Destination" :
+				(isSrcNumaIncorrect) ? "Source" : "Destination");
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-- 
2.39.3