[PATCH 3/4] app/testpmd: check queue count for related options

Ferruh Yigit ferruh.yigit at amd.com
Tue Mar 12 17:59:27 CET 2024


On 3/8/2024 2:48 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> Checking the number of rxq/txq in the middle of option parsing is
> confusing. Move the check where nb_rxq / nb_txq are modified.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>
> ---
>  app/test-pmd/parameters.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/parameters.c b/app/test-pmd/parameters.c
> index 8c21744009..271f0c995a 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/parameters.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/parameters.c
> @@ -1063,6 +1063,8 @@ launch_args_parse(int argc, char** argv)
>  					rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "rxq %d invalid - must be"
>  						  " >= 0 && <= %u\n", n,
>  						  get_allowed_max_nb_rxq(&pid));
> +				if (!nb_rxq && !nb_txq)
> +					rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "Either rx or tx queues should be non-zero\n");
>  			}
>  			if (!strcmp(lgopts[opt_idx].name, "txq")) {
>  				n = atoi(optarg);
> @@ -1072,6 +1074,8 @@ launch_args_parse(int argc, char** argv)
>  					rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "txq %d invalid - must be"
>  						  " >= 0 && <= %u\n", n,
>  						  get_allowed_max_nb_txq(&pid));
> +				if (!nb_rxq && !nb_txq)
> +					rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "Either rx or tx queues should be non-zero\n");
>  			}
>  			if (!strcmp(lgopts[opt_idx].name, "hairpinq")) {
>  				n = atoi(optarg);
> @@ -1098,10 +1102,6 @@ launch_args_parse(int argc, char** argv)
>  						  n + nb_rxq,
>  						  get_allowed_max_nb_rxq(&pid));
>  			}
> -			if (!nb_rxq && !nb_txq) {
> -				rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "Either rx or tx queues should "
> -						"be non-zero\n");
> -			}
>  			if (!strcmp(lgopts[opt_idx].name, "hairpin-mode")) {
>  				char *end = NULL;
>  				unsigned int n;

There is already a runtime check for queues [1], perhaps we can remove
it altogether from arg parse.

Also I think the order of the 'hairpinq' and queue number parameter
processing depends on order user provided, so this may not be very
reliable anyway.


[1]
https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/tree/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c?h=v24.03-rc2#n4621


More information about the dev mailing list