[PATCH v2 1/6] ethdev: support setting lanes

[Ajit Khaparde]

On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 6:58 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> 22/03/2024 08:09, Dengdui Huang:
> > -#define RTE_ETH_LINK_SPEED_10G     RTE_BIT32(8)  /**< 10 Gbps */
> > -#define RTE_ETH_LINK_SPEED_20G     RTE_BIT32(9)  /**< 20 Gbps */
> > -#define RTE_ETH_LINK_SPEED_25G     RTE_BIT32(10) /**< 25 Gbps */
> > -#define RTE_ETH_LINK_SPEED_40G     RTE_BIT32(11) /**< 40 Gbps */
> > -#define RTE_ETH_LINK_SPEED_50G     RTE_BIT32(12) /**< 50 Gbps */
> > -#define RTE_ETH_LINK_SPEED_56G     RTE_BIT32(13) /**< 56 Gbps */
> > -#define RTE_ETH_LINK_SPEED_100G    RTE_BIT32(14) /**< 100 Gbps */
> > -#define RTE_ETH_LINK_SPEED_200G    RTE_BIT32(15) /**< 200 Gbps */
> > -#define RTE_ETH_LINK_SPEED_400G    RTE_BIT32(16) /**< 400 Gbps */
> > +#define RTE_ETH_LINK_SPEED_10G            RTE_BIT32(8)  /**< 10 Gbps */
> > +#define RTE_ETH_LINK_SPEED_20G            RTE_BIT32(9)  /**< 20 Gbps 2lanes */
> > +#define RTE_ETH_LINK_SPEED_25G            RTE_BIT32(10) /**< 25 Gbps */
> > +#define RTE_ETH_LINK_SPEED_40G            RTE_BIT32(11) /**< 40 Gbps 4lanes */
> > +#define RTE_ETH_LINK_SPEED_50G            RTE_BIT32(12) /**< 50 Gbps */
> > +#define RTE_ETH_LINK_SPEED_56G            RTE_BIT32(13) /**< 56 Gbps 4lanes */
> > +#define RTE_ETH_LINK_SPEED_100G           RTE_BIT32(14) /**< 100 Gbps */
> > +#define RTE_ETH_LINK_SPEED_200G           RTE_BIT32(15) /**< 200 Gbps 4lanes */
> > +#define RTE_ETH_LINK_SPEED_400G           RTE_BIT32(16) /**< 400 Gbps 4lanes */
> > +#define RTE_ETH_LINK_SPEED_10G_4LANES     RTE_BIT32(17)  /**< 10 Gbps 4lanes */
> > +#define RTE_ETH_LINK_SPEED_50G_2LANES     RTE_BIT32(18) /**< 50 Gbps 2 lanes */
> > +#define RTE_ETH_LINK_SPEED_100G_2LANES    RTE_BIT32(19) /**< 100 Gbps 2 lanes */
> > +#define RTE_ETH_LINK_SPEED_100G_4LANES    RTE_BIT32(20) /**< 100 Gbps 4lanes */
> > +#define RTE_ETH_LINK_SPEED_200G_2LANES    RTE_BIT32(21) /**< 200 Gbps 2lanes */
> > +#define RTE_ETH_LINK_SPEED_400G_8LANES    RTE_BIT32(22) /**< 400 Gbps 8lanes */
>
> I don't think it is a good idea to make this more complex.
> It brings nothing as far as I can see, compared to having speed and lanes separated.
> Can we have lanes information a separate value? no need for bitmask.
I agree.

>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4218 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/attachments/20240322/57dd11f5/attachment-0001.bin>