[PATCH v3] devtools: add .clang-format file

[Abdullah Ömer Yamaç]

On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 7:21 PM Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>
wrote:

> On Sat,  4 May 2024 19:18:37 +0000
> Abdullah Ömer Yamaç <aomeryamac at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > clang-format is a tool to format C/C++/Objective-C code. It can be used
> > to reformat code to match a given coding style, or to ensure that code
> > adheres to a specific coding style. It helps to maintain a consistent
> > coding style across the DPDK codebase.
> >
> > .clang-format file overrides the default style options provided by
> > clang-format and large set of IDEs and text editors support it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Abdullah Ömer Yamaç <aomeryamac at gmail.com>
>
> Also, this looks wrong.  The initialized arrays looked better before.
>
>
> -static const char *tuntap_types[ETH_TUNTAP_TYPE_MAX] = {
> -       "UNKNOWN", "TUN", "TAP"
> -};
> +static const char *tuntap_types[ETH_TUNTAP_TYPE_MAX] = {"UNKNOWN", "TUN",
> "TAP"};
>
> -static const char *valid_arguments[] = {
> -       ETH_TAP_IFACE_ARG,
> -       ETH_TAP_REMOTE_ARG,
> -       ETH_TAP_MAC_ARG,
> -       ETH_TAP_PERSIST_ARG,
> -       NULL
> -};
> +static const char *valid_arguments[] = {ETH_TAP_IFACE_ARG,
> ETH_TAP_REMOTE_ARG, ETH_TAP_MAC_ARG,
> +                                       ETH_TAP_PERSIST_ARG, NULL};
>

I am confused about these variables.  tuntap_types list values in a single
line, but valid_arguments' values are listed separately.
So, it is getting more complex to handle both of them. What should we do,
do you have any idea?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/attachments/20240505/80c9f7c7/attachment.htm>