[PATCH v5 0/6] Introduce event pre-scheduling
Stephen Hemminger
stephen at networkplumber.org
Fri Oct 4 18:35:00 CEST 2024
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 21:54:45 +0530
<pbhagavatula at marvell.com> wrote:
> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula at marvell.com>
>
> Event pre-scheduling improves scheduling performance by assigning events
> to event ports in advance when dequeues are issued.
> This series introduces various types and levels of pre-scheduling to the
> eventdev library.
>
> pre-scheduling Types:
> * RTE_EVENT_PRESCHEDULE_NONE: No pre-scheduling.
> * RTE_EVENT_PRESCHEDULE: Always issue a pre-schedule when dequeue is issued.
> * RTE_EVENT_PRESCHEDULE_ADAPTIVE: Delay issuing pre-schedule until there
> are no forward progress constraints with the held flow contexts.
>
> pre-scheduling Levels:
> * Event Device Level Pre-scheduling: Pre-scheduling can be enabled or disabled at the
> event device during configuration. Event devices can indicate pre-scheduling
> capabilities using `RTE_EVENT_DEV_CAP_EVENT_PRESCHEDULE` and
> `RTE_EVENT_DEV_CAP_EVENT_PRESCHEDULE_ADAPTIVE` via the event device info
> function `info.event_dev_cap`.
> * Event Port Level Prefetch: Pre-scheduling can be selectively enabled or disabled
> at the event port during runtime. Event devices can indicate this capability
> using `RTE_EVENT_PORT_CAP_PER_PORT_PRESCHEDULE` via the event device info
> function `info.event_port_cap`.
> * Application Controlled Prefetch Hint: Applications can provide hints to the
> event device to start pre-scheduling events using the new API
> `rte_event_port_pre-schedule`. Event devices can indicate this capabilities using
> `RTE_EVENT_DEV_CAP_PRESCHEDULE_EXPLICIT` via the event device info function
> `info.event_dev_cap`.
>
> The rte_event_dequeue_burst operation initiates the pre-schedule operation, which
> completes in parallel without affecting the flow context of the dequeued events and
> dequeue latency. On the next dequeue operation, the pre-scheduleed events are
> dequeued, and pre-schedule operation is initiated again.
>
> In the case of application-controlled pre-schedule hints, the currently held flow
> contexts, if any, are not affected by the pre-schedule operation. On the next
> dequeue operation, the pre-scheduleed events are returned, but pre-schedule is not
> initiated again until the application provides the hint again. If pre-scheduling
> is already enabled at the event device level or event port level, the hint is ignored.
>
> v2 Changes:
> - s/prefetch/pre-schedule (Mattias).
> v3 Changes:
> - Add CNXK preschedule implementation.
> - Update test-eventdev to use prescheduling.
> - Update examples to use prescheduling.
> v4 Changes:
> - Fix compilation.
> v5 Changes:
> - Update ABI changes
> - s/RTE_EVENT_DEV_PRESCHEDULE/RTE_EVENT_PRESCHEDULE/
> - s/RTE_EVENT_DEV_CAP_SW_PRESCHEDULE/RTE_EVENT_DEV_CAP_PRESCHEDULE_EXPLICIT/
> - s/RTE_EVENT_PORT_CAP_EVENT_PER_PORT_PRESCHEDULE/RTE_EVENT_PORT_CAP_PER_PORT_PRESCHEDULE
> - Various documentation fixes and updates.
>
>
> Pavan Nikhilesh (6):
> eventdev: introduce event pre-scheduling
> eventdev: add event port pre-schedule modify
> eventdev: add event preschedule hint
> event/cnkx: add pre-schedule support
> app/test-eventdev: add pre-scheduling support
> examples: use eventdev pre-scheduling
>
> app/test-eventdev/evt_common.h | 45 +++--
> app/test-eventdev/evt_options.c | 17 ++
> app/test-eventdev/evt_options.h | 1 +
> app/test/test_eventdev.c | 143 ++++++++++++++++
> doc/guides/eventdevs/cnxk.rst | 10 --
> doc/guides/eventdevs/features/cnxk.ini | 1 +
> doc/guides/eventdevs/features/default.ini | 1 +
> doc/guides/prog_guide/eventdev/eventdev.rst | 48 ++++++
> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_24_11.rst | 13 ++
> doc/guides/tools/testeventdev.rst | 6 +
> drivers/event/cnxk/cn10k_eventdev.c | 19 ++-
> drivers/event/cnxk/cn10k_worker.c | 21 +++
> drivers/event/cnxk/cn10k_worker.h | 2 +
> drivers/event/cnxk/cnxk_eventdev.c | 2 -
> drivers/event/cnxk/cnxk_eventdev.h | 1 -
> .../pipeline_worker_generic.c | 6 +
> .../eventdev_pipeline/pipeline_worker_tx.c | 6 +
> examples/ipsec-secgw/event_helper.c | 6 +
> examples/l2fwd-event/l2fwd_event_generic.c | 6 +
> .../l2fwd-event/l2fwd_event_internal_port.c | 6 +
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_event_generic.c | 6 +
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_event_internal_port.c | 6 +
> lib/eventdev/eventdev_pmd.h | 4 +
> lib/eventdev/eventdev_private.c | 41 ++++-
> lib/eventdev/eventdev_trace_points.c | 6 +
> lib/eventdev/rte_eventdev.h | 159 ++++++++++++++++++
> lib/eventdev/rte_eventdev_core.h | 14 +-
> lib/eventdev/rte_eventdev_trace_fp.h | 19 ++-
> lib/eventdev/version.map | 6 +
> 29 files changed, 592 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
Looks good, but the new API's should be experimental right?
More information about the dev
mailing list