[PATCH 2/2] net/nfp: enhance the flower service framework
Stephen Hemminger
stephen at networkplumber.org
Thu Oct 10 16:55:08 CEST 2024
On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 15:45:57 +0800
Chaoyong He <chaoyong.he at corigine.com> wrote:
> +static void
> +nfp_flower_service_alarm_func(void *arg)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + uint16_t slot;
> + struct nfp_net_hw_priv *hw_priv;
> + struct nfp_flower_service *service_handle;
> +
> + service_handle = arg;
> + if (!service_handle->alarm_enabled)
> + goto alarm_set;
> +
> + rte_spinlock_lock(&service_handle->spinlock);
> + for (slot = 0; slot < MAX_FLOWER_SERVICE_SLOT; slot++) {
> + hw_priv = service_handle->slots[slot];
> + if (hw_priv == NULL)
> + continue;
> +
> + nfp_flower_ctrl_vnic_process(hw_priv);
> + }
> + rte_spinlock_unlock(&service_handle->spinlock);
> +
The alarm handling is in a non EAL thread, and service is an lcore;
does that matter to this code?
More information about the dev
mailing list