[PATCH v1 1/2] baseband/acc: FFT support in VRB2 PRQ device
Maxime Coquelin
maxime.coquelin at redhat.com
Mon Oct 21 22:20:41 CEST 2024
On 10/21/24 22:12, Chautru, Nicolas wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> Do you want me to send a v2 for this or you can change the comment before applying?
>
> "Also, take the opportunity to fix some unused VRB2 registers definitions".
I can do it while applying.
Thanks,
Maxime
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2024 8:06 AM
>> To: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chautru at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
>> Cc: hemant.agrawal at nxp.com; Vargas, Hernan <hernan.vargas at intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] baseband/acc: FFT support in VRB2 PRQ device
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10/18/24 20:42, Chautru, Nicolas wrote:
>>> Hi Maxime,
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
>>>> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2024 12:54 AM
>>>> To: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chautru at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
>>>> Cc: hemant.agrawal at nxp.com; Vargas, Hernan
>> <hernan.vargas at intel.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] baseband/acc: FFT support in VRB2 PRQ
>>>> device
>>>>
>>>> Hi Nicolas,
>>>>
>>>> On 10/15/24 00:30, Nicolas Chautru wrote:
>>>>> Supporting recent change in the device to extend FFT capability
>>>>> processing in latest stepping.
>>>>> Also including cosmetic change to VRB2 register definition.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru at intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h | 2 +-
>>>>> drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c | 30
>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/baseband/acc/vrb2_vf_enum.h | 4 ++--
>>>>> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h
>>>>> b/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h
>>>>> index 0c249d5b93..4c60b7896b 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h
>>>>> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@
>>>>> #define ACC_MAX_FCW_SIZE 128
>>>>> #define ACC_IQ_SIZE 4
>>>>>
>>>>> -#define ACC_FCW_FFT_BLEN_3 28
>>>>> +#define ACC_FCW_FFT_BLEN_VRB2 128
>>>>>
>>>>> /* Constants from K0 computation from 3GPP 38.212 Table 5.4.2.1-2 */
>>>>> #define ACC_N_ZC_1 66 /* N = 66 Zc for BG 1 */ diff --git
>>>>> a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
>>>>> b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
>>>>> index 0455320c2a..5eb3e8dd48 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_vrb_pmd.c
>>>>> @@ -1006,7 +1006,7 @@ vrb_queue_setup(struct rte_bbdev *dev,
>>>> uint16_t queue_id,
>>>>> case RTE_BBDEV_OP_FFT:
>>>>> fcw_len = ACC_FCW_FFT_BLEN;
>>>>> if (q->d->device_variant == VRB2_VARIANT)
>>>>> - fcw_len = ACC_FCW_FFT_BLEN_3;
>>>>> + fcw_len = ACC_FCW_FFT_BLEN_VRB2;
>>>>> break;
>>>>> case RTE_BBDEV_OP_MLDTS:
>>>>> fcw_len = ACC_FCW_MLDTS_BLEN;
>>>>> @@ -1402,7 +1402,11 @@ vrb_dev_info_get(struct rte_bbdev *dev,
>>>>> struct
>>>> rte_bbdev_driver_info *dev_info)
>>>>> RTE_BBDEV_FFT_FP16_INPUT
>>>> |
>>>>>
>>>> RTE_BBDEV_FFT_FP16_OUTPUT |
>>>>>
>>>> RTE_BBDEV_FFT_POWER_MEAS |
>>>>> -
>>>> RTE_BBDEV_FFT_WINDOWING_BYPASS,
>>>>> +
>>>> RTE_BBDEV_FFT_WINDOWING_BYPASS |
>>>>> +
>>>> RTE_BBDEV_FFT_TIMING_OFFSET_PER_CS |
>>>>> +
>>>> RTE_BBDEV_FFT_TIMING_ERROR |
>>>>> +
>>>> RTE_BBDEV_FFT_DEWINDOWING |
>>>>> +
>>>> RTE_BBDEV_FFT_FREQ_RESAMPLING,
>>>>> .num_buffers_src = 1,
>>>>> .num_buffers_dst = 1,
>>>>> .fft_windows_num = ACC_MAX_FFT_WIN,
>>>> @@ -3725,6 +3729,8 @@
>>>>> vrb1_fcw_fft_fill(struct rte_bbdev_fft_op *op, struct acc_fcw_fft *fcw)
>>>>> static inline void
>>>>> vrb2_fcw_fft_fill(struct rte_bbdev_fft_op *op, struct acc_fcw_fft_3
>> *fcw)
>>>>> {
>>>>> + uint8_t cs;
>>>>> +
>>>>> fcw->in_frame_size = op->fft.input_sequence_size;
>>>>> fcw->leading_pad_size = op->fft.input_leading_padding;
>>>>> fcw->out_frame_size = op->fft.output_sequence_size; @@ -3760,6
>>>>> +3766,16 @@ vrb2_fcw_fft_fill(struct rte_bbdev_fft_op *op, struct
>>>> acc_fcw_fft_3 *fcw)
>>>>> fcw->bypass = 3;
>>>>> else
>>>>> fcw->bypass = 0;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + fcw->enable_dewin = check_bit(op->fft.op_flags,
>>>> RTE_BBDEV_FFT_DEWINDOWING);
>>>>> + fcw->freq_resample_mode = op->fft.freq_resample_mode;
>>>>> + fcw->depad_output_size = fcw->freq_resample_mode == 0 ?
>>>>> + op->fft.output_sequence_size : op-
>>>>> fft.output_depadded_size;
>>>>> + for (cs = 0; cs < RTE_BBDEV_MAX_CS; cs++) {
>>>>> + fcw->cs_theta_0[cs] = op->fft.cs_theta_0[cs];
>>>>> + fcw->cs_theta_d[cs] = op->fft.cs_theta_d[cs];
>>>>> + fcw->cs_time_offset[cs] = op->fft.time_offset[cs];
>>>>> + }
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> static inline int
>>>>> @@ -3782,8 +3798,14 @@ vrb_dma_desc_fft_fill(struct
>> rte_bbdev_fft_op
>>>> *op,
>>>>> /* FCW already done */
>>>>> acc_header_init(desc);
>>>>>
>>>>> - RTE_SET_USED(win_input);
>>>>> - RTE_SET_USED(win_offset);
>>>>> + if (win_en && win_input) {
>>>>> + desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].address =
>>>> rte_pktmbuf_iova_offset(win_input, *win_offset);
>>>>> + desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].blen = op->fft.output_depadded_size
>>>> * 2;
>>>>> + desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].blkid = ACC_DMA_BLKID_DEWIN_IN;
>>>>> + desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].last = 0;
>>>>> + desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].dma_ext = 0;
>>>>> + bd_idx++;
>>>>> + }
>>>>>
>>>>> desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].address = rte_pktmbuf_iova_offset(input,
>>>> *in_offset);
>>>>> desc->data_ptrs[bd_idx].blen = op->fft.input_sequence_size *
>>>>> ACC_IQ_SIZE; diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/vrb2_vf_enum.h
>>>>> b/drivers/baseband/acc/vrb2_vf_enum.h
>>>>> index 9c6e451010..1cc6986c67 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/baseband/acc/vrb2_vf_enum.h
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/vrb2_vf_enum.h
>>>>> @@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ enum {
>>>>> VRB2_VfHiInfoRingIntWrEnVf = 0x00000020,
>>>>> VRB2_VfHiInfoRingPf2VfWrEnVf = 0x00000024,
>>>>> VRB2_VfHiMsixVectorMapperVf = 0x00000060,
>>>>> - VRB2_VfHiDeviceStatus = 0x00000068,
>>>>> - VRB2_VfHiInterruptSrc = 0x00000070,
>>>>> + VRB2_VfHiDeviceStatus = 0x00000064,
>>>>> + VRB2_VfHiInterruptSrc = 0x00000068,
>>>>
>>>> The offset of the registers change, is that what you describe as
>>>> cosmetic change?
>>>>
>>>> Does it have an impact on older DPDK versions? i.e. should it be
>> backported?
>>>
>>> Hi Maxime, These registers are currently not used in the code so it really
>> has no impact.
>>> It is more for documentation purpose and in case we need to use them
>>> in the future, basically not to carry such discrepancy with specs forward.
>>> No actual impact and does not need to be back ported for the same reason.
>>
>> Ok, then I would suggest to just name things as they are in the commit
>> message.
>>
>> "Also, take the opportunity to fix some unsused VRB2 registers definitions".
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Maxime
>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Nic
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Maxime
>>>>
>>>>> VRB2_VfDmaFec5GulDescBaseLoRegVf = 0x00000120,
>>>>> VRB2_VfDmaFec5GulDescBaseHiRegVf = 0x00000124,
>>>>> VRB2_VfDmaFec5GulRespPtrLoRegVf = 0x00000128,
>>>
>
More information about the dev
mailing list