[PATCH v4 0/7] eliminate dependency on non-portable __SIZEOF_LONG__
Andre Muezerie
andremue at linux.microsoft.com
Wed Feb 5 16:37:21 CET 2025
On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 09:15:43AM +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 10:54:24AM -0800, Andre Muezerie wrote:
> > Macro __SIZEOF_LONG__ is not standardized and MSVC does not define it.
> > Therefore the errors below are seen with MSVC:
> >
> > ../lib/mldev/mldev_utils_scalar.c(465): error C2065:
> > '__SIZEOF_LONG__': undeclared identifier
> > ../lib/mldev/mldev_utils_scalar.c(478): error C2051:
> > case expression not constant
> >
> > ../lib/mldev/mldev_utils_scalar_bfloat16.c(33): error C2065:
> > '__SIZEOF_LONG__': undeclared identifier
> > ../lib/mldev/mldev_utils_scalar_bfloat16.c(49): error C2051:
> > case expression not constant
> >
> > Turns out that the places where __SIZEOF_LONG__ is currently
> > being used can equally well use sizeof(long) instead.
> >
> > v4:
> > * rebased on latest main as previous patch was not applying cleanly
> > anymore.
> >
> > v3:
> > * added prefix RTE_ to BITS_PER_LONG* and moved them to rte_common.h
> > * defined PLT_BITS_PER_LONG* in drivers/common/cnxk/roc_platform.h to
> > avoid warnings from checkpatches.sh like:
> >
> > Warning in drivers/common/cnxk/roc_bits.h:
> > Warning in drivers/common/cnxk/roc_ie_ot.h:
> > Warning in drivers/common/cnxk/roc_ie_ot_tls.h:
> > Use plt_ symbols instead of rte_ API in cnxk base driver
> >
> > It can be seen that the same was done in the past for similar
> > macros like PLT_CACHE_LINE_SIZE
> >
> > v2:
> > * fixed typo in commit message
> >
> > Andre Muezerie (7):
> > eal: eliminate dependency on non-portable __SIZEOF_LONG__
> > drivers/bus: eliminate dependency on non-portable __SIZEOF_LONG__
> > drivers/common: eliminate dependency on non-portable __SIZEOF_LONG__
> > drivers/dma: eliminate dependency on non-portable __SIZEOF_LONG__
> > drivers/net: eliminate dependency on non-portable __SIZEOF_LONG__
> > drivers/raw: eliminate dependency on non-portable __SIZEOF_LONG__
> > mldev: eliminate dependency on non-portable __SIZEOF_LONG__
> >
> Just out of interest, is there are reason why the simple solution of just
> putting "#define __SIZEOF_LONG__ (sizeof(long))" in a header file for MSVC
> is not done? Should be a couple of lines in a single patch, rather than a
> 7-patch series, no?
>
> After all, just because something is non-standard, doesn't mean that we
> can't use it if its widely available.
>
> /Bruce
Yes, that can be done instead. I'll send out a new series with that approach.
More information about the dev
mailing list