questions about pinned external buffers
Morten Brørup
mb at smartsharesystems.com
Thu Jan 9 13:11:41 CET 2025
Pinned external buffers were introduced with this patch:
https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h?id=6ef1107ad4c6d4fcb6be627367ee0b97bb13e822
Question 1:
Please confirm that the mbuf's pinned external buffer's refcnt is supposed to be 1 when an mbuf is returned to the mempool?
If so, the below assertion should be updated for completion:
rte_mbuf_raw_free(struct rte_mbuf *m)
{
RTE_ASSERT(!RTE_MBUF_CLONED(m) &&
- (!RTE_MBUF_HAS_EXTBUF(m) || RTE_MBUF_HAS_PINNED_EXTBUF(m)));
+ (!RTE_MBUF_HAS_EXTBUF(m) ||
+ (RTE_MBUF_HAS_PINNED_EXTBUF(m) &&
+ rte_mbuf_ext_refcnt_read(m->shinfo) == 1)));
__rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check(m);
rte_mempool_put(m->pool, m);
}
The increased performance cost should be acceptable for debug builds (i.e. with assertions enabled).
Question 2:
Could this assertion be moved to __rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check()?
I'm working on a new rte_mbuf_raw_free_bulk() function, for use with RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE; and if the assertion is not moved to __rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check(), it needs to be copy-pasted into the new raw_free_bulk() function too.
More information about the dev
mailing list