[PATCH v2 3/3] baseband/acc: add internal logging

[Stephen Hemminger]

On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 17:52:43 +0000
"Chautru, Nicolas" <nicolas.chautru at intel.com> wrote:

> Hi Stephen, 
> 
> The commit message may be misleading, the logging interface doesn't change here. Note also that I reuse existing trace point framework for some of the error logging when relevant (see previous commit). 
> Here the scope for that buffer is more limited, not a new logging method really (the commit message is misleading). 
> The queue_ops_dump() already provides api to dump device specific information related to queue into file (logging in real time is not an option) based on information already in PMD memory. 
> This new buffer is purely there to add storage for the string out of rte_bbdev_ops_param_string() for failed operation on that queue, so that extend that capture as this info is not stored by PMD. 
> The name of the buffer could be renamed probably, or I could store copy of the actual operation instead of the string in case that makes a difference for you. 
> 
> I guess it would possible to move this to trace point but I thought it would be quite convoluted. That information would fits nicely in the queue dump capture, and this would require adding trace point for each operation type (I don't believe it can manage arbitrary string) and would be a bit of an unconventional use of trace point.
> 
> Any thought?
> 
> Thanks
> Nic
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2025 3:24 PM
> > To: Chautru, Nicolas <nicolas.chautru at intel.com>
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; maxime.coquelin at redhat.com;
> > hemant.agrawal at nxp.com; Vargas, Hernan <hernan.vargas at intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] baseband/acc: add internal logging
> > 
> > On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:55:19 -0800
> > Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru at intel.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > Adds internal buffer for more flexible logging.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru <nicolas.chautru at intel.com>  
> > 
> > Inventing another device specific error log seems like a short sighted
> > concept.
> > Why doesn't existing DPDK logging work well enough?  
> 

My feedback is that why can't you just use DEBUG logging for this.