[PATCH v4 0/7] net/ena: release 2.13.0

[Brandes, Shai]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2025 5:55 PM
> To: Brandes, Shai <shaibran at amazon.com>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v4 0/7] net/ena: release 2.13.0
> 
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
> links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the
> content is safe.
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 11:08:12 +0000
> "Brandes, Shai" <shaibran at amazon.com> wrote:
> 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>
> > > Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2025 7:50 PM
> > > To: Brandes, Shai <shaibran at amazon.com>
> > > Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> > > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v4 0/7] net/ena: release 2.13.0
> > >
> > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
> > > not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the
> > > sender and know the content is safe.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 28 May 2025 13:25:24 +0300
> > > Shai Brandes <shaibran at amazon.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This patchset includes an upgrade of the ENA HAL, introduces a new
> > > > feature, and addresses three bug fixes.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you in advance to the net maintainers and community members
> > > > for your time and effort reviewing the code.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Shai Brandes
> > > > AWS Elastic Network Adapter team
> > >
> > > Could you check against current main branch.
> > > This no longer applies, either it already got merged or something
> changed.
> > Hi Stephen, the merge conflict occurred due to updates in the release notes
> after we initially uploaded the patchset.
> > I've rebased the changes on top of origin/main and will submit a revised
> version shortly. I'll go ahead and abandon the previous set.
> >
> > Just a quick note, we originally submitted the patchset over a month ago,
> and it has been in the "awaiting upstream" state since then.
> > I noticed that rc2 has already been released.
> > we would greatly appreciate it if you could include the ENA changes in rc3.
> > ENA is a self-contained module, and the previous maintainer approved that
> mode of operation. Hopefully, an exception can be made in this case.
> > Thanks again for your time and continued support.
> 
> Thanks, that version got lost in the huge patchsets that were sitting in backlog.
Hi Stephen, just wanted to touch base and confirm we're still on track to include the patchset in rc3. Let me know if there's anything you need from me to help move things forward.
Thanks!