[PATCH 2/2] net/cpfl: validate fieldvector offsets before copying keys
Stephen Hemminger
stephen at networkplumber.org
Mon Aug 17 00:33:37 CEST 2026
On Sat, 21 Mar 2026 10:16:34 +0800
Pengpeng Hou <pengpeng at iscas.ac.cn> wrote:
> The CPFL JSON parser accepts fieldvector offsets and SEM key sizes straight from the input description. Reject offsets that would write past the 64-byte SEM fieldvector storage and reject key sizes that would later overread the fixed source buffer or overflow the destination key buffer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pengpeng Hou <pengpeng at iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
This patch does not build which makes it a complete NAK.
Also, lots of AI reported issues.
Patch 2/2: net/cpfl: validate fieldvector offsets
Error: does not compile
In cpfl_flow_js_pattern_per_act():
if (js_act->sem.keysize > sizeof(js_act->sem.cpfl_flow_pr_fv)) {
js_act is struct cpfl_flow_js_pr_action *, so js_act->sem is
struct cpfl_flow_js_pr_action_sem, whose members are prof,
subprof, keysize, fv and fv_size. There is no cpfl_flow_pr_fv
member. That name belongs to struct cpfl_flow_pr_action_sem, a
different type (cpfl_flow_parser.h:236-241). The JSON spec
structure and the runtime action structure have been confused.
The intended bound is CPFL_JS_SEM_FV_KEY_NUM_MAX.
Error: the fv_proto offset check bounds the wrong value and is
discarded
The check added to cpfl_flow_js_pattern_act_fv_proto() applies to
the offset stored in js_fv->proto.offset. That is a byte offset
into the matched rte_flow item's spec buffer, consumed in
cpfl_parse_fv_protocol() as
pointer = &(((const uint8_t *)(items[j].spec))[v_offset]);
It is not a field-vector index, so bounding it by
CPFL_JS_SEM_FV_KEY_NUM_MAX / 2 rejects legitimate protocol
offsets while preventing no overflow.
It also has no effect at all: both callers ignore the return
value.
cpfl_flow_js_pattern_act_fv_proto(ob_value, js_fv);
cpfl_flow_js_pattern_act_fv_proto(cjson_value, js_fv);
in cpfl_flow_js_pattern_act_fv() and
cpfl_flow_js_pattern_act_fv_lem(). The same is true of
cpfl_flow_js_pattern_act_fv_metadata(). Those unchecked returns
are a pre-existing bug worth fixing, but they mean this hunk is
dead code as written.
The check added in cpfl_flow_js_pattern_act_fv() is the correct
one: js_fv->offset is what indexes fv[2 * offset] and
fv[2 * offset + 1] in cpfl_parse_fieldvectors(), and the SEM
vector is CPFL_JS_SEM_FV_KEY_NUM_MAX (64) bytes, so offset < 32
is right.
Error: the LEM path has the identical bugs and is left unfixed
cpfl_flow_js_pattern_act_fv_lem() reads js_fv->offset with no
bound. cpfl_parse_fieldvectors() writes fv[2 * offset] and
fv[2 * offset + 1] into pr_action->lem.cpfl_flow_pr_fv, which is
CPFL_JS_LEM_FV_KEY_NUM_MAX (32) bytes, so the LEM bound is
offset < 16, not 32.
cpfl_fxp_parse_pattern() likewise guards only the SEM branch:
memcpy(rinfo->lem.key, pr_action->lem.cpfl_flow_pr_fv,
rinfo->lem.key_byte_len);
key_byte_len comes from the unvalidated uint16_t lem.keysize, the
source is 32 bytes and rinfo->lem.key is 128, so this both
overreads the source by up to ~64 KB and overflows the
destination. That is the same bug the patch fixes for SEM.
Info: second condition in the SEM check is unreachable
if (pr_action->sem.keysize > sizeof(pr_action->sem.cpfl_flow_pr_fv) ||
pr_action->sem.keysize > sizeof(rinfo->sem.key)) {
cpfl_flow_pr_fv is 64 bytes, rinfo->sem.key is
MEV_SEM_RULE_KEY_SIZE (128). The first condition always fires
first; the second can be dropped.
Warning: missing Fixes: and Cc: stable at dpdk.org
Fixes: 41f20298ee8c ("net/cpfl: parse flow offloading hint from JSON")
More information about the dev
mailing list