[PATCH v1 0/5] prefix lcore role enum values
lihuisong (C)
lihuisong at huawei.com
Tue Jun 23 13:52:40 CEST 2026
On 6/22/2026 4:18 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> On Mon, 22 Jun 2026 at 03:23, lihuisong (C) <lihuisong at huawei.com> wrote:
>> On 6/19/2026 10:03 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2026 13:48:37 +0200
>>> Morten Brørup <mb at smartsharesystems.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> From: Huisong Li [mailto:lihuisong at huawei.com]
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 17 June 2026 12.28
>>>>>
>>>>> Add the RTE_LCORE_ prefix to the lcore role enum values in
>>>>> rte_lcore_role_t
>>>>> to follow DPDK naming conventions.
>>>>>
>>>>> - ROLE_RTE -> RTE_LCORE_ROLE_RTE
>>>>> - ROLE_OFF -> RTE_LCORE_ROLE_OFF
>>>>> - ROLE_SERVICE -> RTE_LCORE_ROLE_SERVICE
>>>>> - ROLE_NON_EAL -> RTE_LCORE_ROLE_NON_EAL
>>>>>
>>>>> Old names are kept as macros aliasing to the new names to preserve
>>>>> backward compatibility.
>>>>>
>>>> Series-Acked-by: Morten Brørup <mb at smartsharesystems.com>
>>>>
>>> The problem with this patch it causes build failures now with abi diff.
>>>
>>> Example build log...
>>>
>>>
>>> 2 functions with some indirect sub-type change:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [C] 'function rte_lcore_role_t rte_eal_lcore_role(unsigned int)' at eal_common_lcore.c:74:1 has some indirect sub-type changes:
>>>
>>> return type changed:
>>>
>>> type size hasn't changed
>>>
>>> 4 enumerator deletions:
>>>
>>> 'rte_lcore_role_t::ROLE_RTE' value '0'
>>>
>>> 'rte_lcore_role_t::ROLE_OFF' value '1'
>>>
>>> 'rte_lcore_role_t::ROLE_SERVICE' value '2'
>>>
>>> 'rte_lcore_role_t::ROLE_NON_EAL' value '3'
>>>
>>> 4 enumerator insertions:
>>>
>>> 'rte_lcore_role_t::RTE_LCORE_ROLE_RTE' value '0'
>>>
>>> 'rte_lcore_role_t::RTE_LCORE_ROLE_OFF' value '1'
>>>
>>> 'rte_lcore_role_t::RTE_LCORE_ROLE_SERVICE' value '2'
>>>
>>> 'rte_lcore_role_t::RTE_LCORE_ROLE_NON_EAL' value '3'
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [C] 'function int rte_lcore_has_role(unsigned int, rte_lcore_role_t)' at eal_common_lcore.c:85:1 has some indirect sub-type changes:
>>>
>>> parameter 2 of type 'enum rte_lcore_role_t' has sub-type changes:
>>>
>>> enum type 'enum rte_lcore_role_t' changed at rte_lcore.h:33:1, as reported earlier
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Error: ABI issue reported for abidiff --suppr /home/runner/work/dpdk/dpdk/devtools/libabigail.abignore --no-added-syms --headers-dir1 reference/usr/local/include --headers-dir2 install/usr/local/include reference/usr/local/lib/librte_eal.so.26.1 install/usr/local/lib/librte_eal.so.26.2
>> We just came back from the Dragon Boat Festival.
>> I also received this ABI change warning. But I didn't have any good
>> ideas yet.
>> Thanks for helping to handle this.
>> Sorry for the inconvenience.
> There is nothing broken from a ABI pov.
> This is a limitation in earlier versions of libabigail.
> I can't reproduce with libabigail 2.9 (update in progress as I see
> 2.10 is available now).
>
> I think it was solved in libabigail 2.8
> (https://sourceware.org/git/?p=libabigail.git;a=commit;h=6f5f91564bdd).
This seems to solve the problem.
>
> If we want to go with the enum renaming before 26.11, bumping
> libabigail to 2.10 in the CI is an option (latest upstream version,
> and this is the version in f43 and f44).
> I tried it in GHA:
> https://github.com/david-marchand/dpdk/actions/runs/27937595115/job/82662953500
I also tested it based on libabigail 2.9.0 version. No any warning.
-->
abidiff build-ref/lib/librte_eal.so build-new/lib/librte_eal.so
Functions changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed (2 filtered out), 0
Added functions
Variables changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 0 Added variable
>
>
More information about the dev
mailing list