[PATCH v5 3/9] bpf: mask shift count in interpreter per RFC 9669
Marat Khalili
marat.khalili at huawei.com
Thu Jun 25 17:35:52 CEST 2026
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>
> Sent: Wednesday 24 June 2026 18:55
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>; stable at dpdk.org; Konstantin Ananyev
> <konstantin.ananyev at huawei.com>; Marat Khalili <marat.khalili at huawei.com>; Ferruh Yigit
> <ferruh.yigit at amd.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v5 3/9] bpf: mask shift count in interpreter per RFC 9669
>
> The interpreter shifted by the raw immediate or register value, which
> is undefined behavior in C when the count is >= the operand width and
> trips UBSan. RFC 9669 masks shift counts (0x3f for 64-bit, 0x1f for
> 32-bit); mask the count in the LSH/RSH/ARSH cases.
>
> Fixes: 94972f35a02e ("bpf: add BPF loading and execution framework")
> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>
Acked-by: Marat Khalili <marat.khalili at huawei.com>
> ---
> lib/bpf/bpf_exec.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/bpf/bpf_exec.c b/lib/bpf/bpf_exec.c
> index d423ef28f5..bb03c9cc2c 100644
> --- a/lib/bpf/bpf_exec.c
> +++ b/lib/bpf/bpf_exec.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdint.h>
> +#include <limits.h>
>
> #include <eal_export.h>
> #include <rte_common.h>
> @@ -43,6 +44,16 @@
> ((reg)[(ins)->dst_reg] = \
> (type)(reg)[(ins)->dst_reg] op (type)(ins)->imm)
>
> +#define BPF_OP_SHIFT_IMM(reg, ins, op, type) \
> + ((reg)[(ins)->dst_reg] = \
> + (type)(reg)[(ins)->dst_reg] op \
> + ((ins)->imm & (sizeof(type) * CHAR_BIT - 1)))
> +
> +#define BPF_OP_SHIFT_REG(reg, ins, op, type) \
> + ((reg)[(ins)->dst_reg] = \
> + (type)(reg)[(ins)->dst_reg] op \
> + ((reg)[(ins)->src_reg] & (sizeof(type) * CHAR_BIT - 1)))
> +
> #define BPF_DIV_ZERO_CHECK(bpf, reg, ins, type) do { \
> if ((type)(reg)[(ins)->src_reg] == 0) { \
> RTE_BPF_LOG_LINE(ERR, \
> @@ -183,10 +194,10 @@ bpf_exec(const struct rte_bpf *bpf, uint64_t reg[EBPF_REG_NUM])
> BPF_OP_ALU_IMM(reg, ins, |, uint32_t);
> break;
> case (BPF_ALU | BPF_LSH | BPF_K):
> - BPF_OP_ALU_IMM(reg, ins, <<, uint32_t);
> + BPF_OP_SHIFT_IMM(reg, ins, <<, uint32_t);
> break;
> case (BPF_ALU | BPF_RSH | BPF_K):
> - BPF_OP_ALU_IMM(reg, ins, >>, uint32_t);
> + BPF_OP_SHIFT_IMM(reg, ins, >>, uint32_t);
> break;
> case (BPF_ALU | BPF_XOR | BPF_K):
> BPF_OP_ALU_IMM(reg, ins, ^, uint32_t);
> @@ -217,10 +228,10 @@ bpf_exec(const struct rte_bpf *bpf, uint64_t reg[EBPF_REG_NUM])
> BPF_OP_ALU_REG(reg, ins, |, uint32_t);
> break;
> case (BPF_ALU | BPF_LSH | BPF_X):
> - BPF_OP_ALU_REG(reg, ins, <<, uint32_t);
> + BPF_OP_SHIFT_REG(reg, ins, <<, uint32_t);
> break;
> case (BPF_ALU | BPF_RSH | BPF_X):
> - BPF_OP_ALU_REG(reg, ins, >>, uint32_t);
> + BPF_OP_SHIFT_REG(reg, ins, >>, uint32_t);
> break;
> case (BPF_ALU | BPF_XOR | BPF_X):
> BPF_OP_ALU_REG(reg, ins, ^, uint32_t);
> @@ -262,13 +273,13 @@ bpf_exec(const struct rte_bpf *bpf, uint64_t reg[EBPF_REG_NUM])
> BPF_OP_ALU_IMM(reg, ins, |, uint64_t);
> break;
> case (EBPF_ALU64 | BPF_LSH | BPF_K):
> - BPF_OP_ALU_IMM(reg, ins, <<, uint64_t);
> + BPF_OP_SHIFT_IMM(reg, ins, <<, uint64_t);
> break;
> case (EBPF_ALU64 | BPF_RSH | BPF_K):
> - BPF_OP_ALU_IMM(reg, ins, >>, uint64_t);
> + BPF_OP_SHIFT_IMM(reg, ins, >>, uint64_t);
> break;
> case (EBPF_ALU64 | EBPF_ARSH | BPF_K):
> - BPF_OP_ALU_IMM(reg, ins, >>, int64_t);
> + BPF_OP_SHIFT_IMM(reg, ins, >>, int64_t);
> break;
> case (EBPF_ALU64 | BPF_XOR | BPF_K):
> BPF_OP_ALU_IMM(reg, ins, ^, uint64_t);
> @@ -299,13 +310,13 @@ bpf_exec(const struct rte_bpf *bpf, uint64_t reg[EBPF_REG_NUM])
> BPF_OP_ALU_REG(reg, ins, |, uint64_t);
> break;
> case (EBPF_ALU64 | BPF_LSH | BPF_X):
> - BPF_OP_ALU_REG(reg, ins, <<, uint64_t);
> + BPF_OP_SHIFT_REG(reg, ins, <<, uint64_t);
> break;
> case (EBPF_ALU64 | BPF_RSH | BPF_X):
> - BPF_OP_ALU_REG(reg, ins, >>, uint64_t);
> + BPF_OP_SHIFT_REG(reg, ins, >>, uint64_t);
> break;
> case (EBPF_ALU64 | EBPF_ARSH | BPF_X):
> - BPF_OP_ALU_REG(reg, ins, >>, int64_t);
> + BPF_OP_SHIFT_REG(reg, ins, >>, int64_t);
> break;
> case (EBPF_ALU64 | BPF_XOR | BPF_X):
> BPF_OP_ALU_REG(reg, ins, ^, uint64_t);
> --
> 2.53.0
More information about the dev
mailing list