[RFC v3 2/5] eal/freebsd: fix a FD leak in the alarm subsystem
David Marchand
david.marchand at redhat.com
Mon Sep 7 14:13:45 CEST 2026
Caught by code review, while looking at rte_intr_instance_free() users.
Even if the FD is not used, it must still be closed when uninitialising
the alarm subsystem.
Fixes: 26021a715067 ("eal/bsd: support alarm API")
Cc: stable at dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>
---
lib/eal/freebsd/eal_alarm.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_alarm.c b/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_alarm.c
index c03e281e67..2905841b5e 100644
--- a/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_alarm.c
+++ b/lib/eal/freebsd/eal_alarm.c
@@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ rte_eal_alarm_cleanup(void)
int ret = rte_intr_callback_unregister_sync(intr_handle,
eal_alarm_callback, (void *)-1);
if (ret >= 0) {
+ close(rte_intr_fd_get(intr_handle));
+ rte_intr_fd_set(intr_handle, -1);
rte_intr_instance_free(intr_handle);
intr_handle = NULL;
}
@@ -62,7 +64,7 @@ rte_eal_alarm_cleanup(void)
int
rte_eal_alarm_init(void)
{
- int fd;
+ int fd = -1;
intr_handle = rte_intr_instance_alloc(RTE_INTR_INSTANCE_F_PRIVATE);
if (intr_handle == NULL) {
@@ -88,6 +90,8 @@ rte_eal_alarm_init(void)
return 0;
error:
+ if (fd >= 0)
+ close(fd);
rte_intr_instance_free(intr_handle);
return -1;
}
--
2.54.0
More information about the dev
mailing list