[dpdk-stable] patch 'test/crypto: fix missing operation status check' has been queued to stable release 19.11.1

Dybkowski, AdamX adamx.dybkowski at intel.com
Wed Feb 12 12:19:38 CET 2020


Hi Kevin.

I made the fix to be applied onto "18.11" branch at:
  Clone URL: git://dpdk.org/dpdk-stable
  Last commits: https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/log/?h=18.11
Is this the correct one?

The patch I sent (that updates the file app/test/test_cryptodev.c only) can be applied on my side with no issues.

Adam

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktraynor at redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 11 February, 2020 13:10
> To: Luca Boccassi <luca.boccassi at gmail.com>; Dybkowski, AdamX
> <adamx.dybkowski at intel.com>
> Cc: Trahe, Fiona <fiona.trahe at intel.com>; Ankur Dwivedi
> <adwivedi at marvell.com>; Anoob Joseph <anoobj at marvell.com>; dpdk
> stable <stable at dpdk.org>
> Subject: Re: patch 'test/crypto: fix missing operation status check' has been
> queued to stable release 19.11.1
> 
> On 11/02/2020 11:52, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > That's a question for Kevin, the 18.11 maintainer.
> >
> > On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 11:37 +0000, Dybkowski, AdamX wrote:
> >> Hi Luca.
> >>
> >> I originally targeted this patch for DPDK 18.11. That's good it'll go
> >> into 19.11, too. But will it be applied to 18.11 as well?
> >>
> 
> I tried to apply it on 18.11 branch last week, but it doesn't apply and I have a
> note to say there was too much churn. So, you'll need to send a rebased
> version on 18.11 branch. It will be on the list of commits that didn't apply and
> asking authors for rebase that I'll send out a bit later.
> 
> >> Adam
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From:
> >>> luca.boccassi at gmail.com
> >>>  [mailto:
> >>> luca.boccassi at gmail.com
> >>> ]
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, 11 February, 2020 12:19
> >>> To: Dybkowski, AdamX <
> >>> adamx.dybkowski at intel.com
> >>>>
> >>> Cc: Trahe, Fiona <
> >>> fiona.trahe at intel.com
> >>>> ; Ankur Dwivedi
> >>> <
> >>> adwivedi at marvell.com
> >>>> ; Anoob Joseph <
> >>> anoobj at marvell.com
> >>>> ; dpdk
> >>> stable <
> >>> stable at dpdk.org
> >>>>
> >>> Subject: patch 'test/crypto: fix missing operation status check'
> >>> has been
> >>> queued to stable release 19.11.1
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> FYI, your patch has been queued to stable release 19.11.1
> >>>
> >>> Note it hasn't been pushed to
> >>> http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable
> >>>  yet.
> >>> It will be pushed if I get no objections before 02/13/20. So please
> >>> shout if anyone has objections.
> >>>
> >>> Also note that after the patch there's a diff of the upstream commit
> >>> vs the patch applied to the branch. This will indicate if there was
> >>> any rebasing needed to apply to the stable branch. If there were
> >>> code changes for rebasing
> >>> (ie: not only metadata diffs), please double check that the rebase
> >>> was correctly done.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks.
> >>>
> >>> Luca Boccassi
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> From ce8302172f9f8e06833a49abf8b283a71b07dc3b Mon Sep 17
> 00:00:00
> >>> 2001
> >>> From: Adam Dybkowski <
> >>> adamx.dybkowski at intel.com
> >>>>
> >>> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:58:52 +0100
> >>> Subject: [PATCH] test/crypto: fix missing operation status check
> >>>
> >>> [ upstream commit b26ef1a11f21ecde63582ed6db281c93ce9fbf23 ]
> >>>
> >>> This patch adds checking of the symmetric crypto operation status
> >>> that was
> >>> silently skipped before. It fixes the wireless algorithms session
> >>> creation
> >>> (SNOW3G, KASUMI, ZUC) and passing of the digest data for the
> >>> verification
> >>> by PMD. Also fixed the missing aad padding issue revealed after op
> >>> status
> >>> checking was introduced.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: c0f87eb5252b ("cryptodev: change burst API to be crypto op
> >>> oriented")
> >>> Fixes: 77a217a19bb7 ("test/crypto: add AES-CCM tests")
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Adam Dybkowski <
> >>> adamx.dybkowski at intel.com
> >>>>
> >>> Acked-by: Fiona Trahe <
> >>> fiona.trahe at intel.com
> >>>>
> >>> Tested-by: Ankur Dwivedi <
> >>> adwivedi at marvell.com
> >>>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Anoob Joseph <
> >>> anoobj at marvell.com
> >>>>
> >>> ---
> >>>  app/test/test_cryptodev.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >>> ------
> >>>  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> >>> index
> >>> 1b561456d7..79ced809de 100644
> >>> --- a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> >>> +++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
> >>> @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static struct rte_crypto_op *
> >>> process_crypto_request(uint8_t dev_id, struct rte_crypto_op *op)  {
> >>>  	if (rte_cryptodev_enqueue_burst(dev_id, 0, &op, 1) != 1) {
> >>> -		printf("Error sending packet for encryption");
> >>> +		RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "Error sending packet for
> >>> encryption\n");
> >>>  		return NULL;
> >>>  	}
> >>>
> >>> @@ -152,6 +152,11 @@ process_crypto_request(uint8_t dev_id, struct
> >>> rte_crypto_op *op)
> >>>  	while (rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(dev_id, 0, &op, 1) == 0)
> >>>  		rte_pause();
> >>>
> >>> +	if (op->status != RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
> >>> +		RTE_LOG(DEBUG, USER1, "Operation status %d\n", op-
> >>>> status);
> >>>
> >>> +		return NULL;
> >>> +	}
> >>> +
> >>>  	return op;
> >>>  }
> >>>
> >>> @@ -2823,9 +2828,18 @@
> >>> create_wireless_algo_auth_cipher_session(uint8_t dev_id,
> >>>  	ut_params->sess = rte_cryptodev_sym_session_create(
> >>>  			ts_params->session_mpool);
> >>>
> >>> -	status = rte_cryptodev_sym_session_init(dev_id, ut_params-
> >>>> sess,
> >>> -			&ut_params->auth_xform,
> >>> -			ts_params->session_priv_mpool);
> >>> +	if (cipher_op == RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_OP_DECRYPT) {
> >>> +		ut_params->auth_xform.next = NULL;
> >>> +		ut_params->cipher_xform.next = &ut_params->auth_xform;
> >>> +		status = rte_cryptodev_sym_session_init(dev_id,
> >>> ut_params-
> >>>> sess,
> >>>
> >>> +				&ut_params->cipher_xform,
> >>> +				ts_params->session_priv_mpool);
> >>> +
> >>> +	} else
> >>> +		status = rte_cryptodev_sym_session_init(dev_id,
> >>> ut_params-
> >>>> sess,
> >>>
> >>> +				&ut_params->auth_xform,
> >>> +				ts_params->session_priv_mpool);
> >>> +
> >>>  	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(status, 0, "session init failed");
> >>>  	TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ut_params->sess, "Session creation
> >>> failed");
> >>>
> >>> @@ -3018,13 +3032,14 @@
> >>> create_wireless_algo_cipher_hash_operation(const uint8_t
> >>> *auth_tag,  }
> >>>
> >>>  static int
> >>> -create_wireless_algo_auth_cipher_operation(unsigned int
> >>> auth_tag_len,
> >>> +create_wireless_algo_auth_cipher_operation(
> >>> +		const uint8_t *auth_tag, unsigned int auth_tag_len,
> >>>  		const uint8_t *cipher_iv, uint8_t cipher_iv_len,
> >>>  		const uint8_t *auth_iv, uint8_t auth_iv_len,
> >>>  		unsigned int data_pad_len,
> >>>  		unsigned int cipher_len, unsigned int cipher_offset,
> >>>  		unsigned int auth_len, unsigned int auth_offset,
> >>> -		uint8_t op_mode, uint8_t do_sgl)
> >>> +		uint8_t op_mode, uint8_t do_sgl, uint8_t verify)
> >>>  {
> >>>  	struct crypto_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
> >>>  	struct crypto_unittest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params; @@
> >>> -3081,6 +3096,10 @@
> >>> create_wireless_algo_auth_cipher_operation(unsigned int
> >>> auth_tag_len,
> >>>  		}
> >>>  	}
> >>>
> >>> +	/* Copy digest for the verification */
> >>> +	if (verify)
> >>> +		memcpy(sym_op->auth.digest.data, auth_tag,
> >>> auth_tag_len);
> >>> +
> >>>  	/* Copy cipher and auth IVs at the end of the crypto operation
> >>> */
> >>>  	uint8_t *iv_ptr = rte_crypto_op_ctod_offset(
> >>>  			ut_params->op, uint8_t *, IV_OFFSET); @@
> >>> -4643,7
> >>> +4662,7 @@ test_snow3g_auth_cipher(const struct snow3g_test_data
> >>> *tdata,
> >>>
> >>>  	/* Create SNOW 3G operation */
> >>>  	retval = create_wireless_algo_auth_cipher_operation(
> >>> -		tdata->digest.len,
> >>> +		tdata->digest.data, tdata->digest.len,
> >>>  		tdata->cipher_iv.data, tdata->cipher_iv.len,
> >>>  		tdata->auth_iv.data, tdata->auth_iv.len,
> >>>  		(tdata->digest.offset_bytes == 0 ?
> >>> @@ -4653,7 +4672,7 @@ test_snow3g_auth_cipher(const struct
> >>> snow3g_test_data *tdata,
> >>>  		tdata->cipher.offset_bits,
> >>>  		tdata->validAuthLenInBits.len,
> >>>  		tdata->auth.offset_bits,
> >>> -		op_mode, 0);
> >>> +		op_mode, 0, verify);
> >>>
> >>>  	if (retval < 0)
> >>>  		return retval;
> >>> @@ -4819,7 +4838,7 @@ test_snow3g_auth_cipher_sgl(const struct
> >>> snow3g_test_data *tdata,
> >>>
> >>>  	/* Create SNOW 3G operation */
> >>>  	retval = create_wireless_algo_auth_cipher_operation(
> >>> -		tdata->digest.len,
> >>> +		tdata->digest.data, tdata->digest.len,
> >>>  		tdata->cipher_iv.data, tdata->cipher_iv.len,
> >>>  		tdata->auth_iv.data, tdata->auth_iv.len,
> >>>  		(tdata->digest.offset_bytes == 0 ?
> >>> @@ -4829,7 +4848,7 @@ test_snow3g_auth_cipher_sgl(const struct
> >>> snow3g_test_data *tdata,
> >>>  		tdata->cipher.offset_bits,
> >>>  		tdata->validAuthLenInBits.len,
> >>>  		tdata->auth.offset_bits,
> >>> -		op_mode, 1);
> >>> +		op_mode, 1, verify);
> >>>
> >>>  	if (retval < 0)
> >>>  		return retval;
> >>> @@ -4988,7 +5007,7 @@ test_kasumi_auth_cipher(const struct
> >>> kasumi_test_data *tdata,
> >>>
> >>>  	/* Create KASUMI operation */
> >>>  	retval = create_wireless_algo_auth_cipher_operation(
> >>> -		tdata->digest.len,
> >>> +		tdata->digest.data, tdata->digest.len,
> >>>  		tdata->cipher_iv.data, tdata->cipher_iv.len,
> >>>  		NULL, 0,
> >>>  		(tdata->digest.offset_bytes == 0 ?
> >>> @@ -4998,7 +5017,7 @@ test_kasumi_auth_cipher(const struct
> >>> kasumi_test_data *tdata,
> >>>  		tdata->validCipherOffsetInBits.len,
> >>>  		tdata->validAuthLenInBits.len,
> >>>  		0,
> >>> -		op_mode, 0);
> >>> +		op_mode, 0, verify);
> >>>
> >>>  	if (retval < 0)
> >>>  		return retval;
> >>> @@ -5165,7 +5184,7 @@ test_kasumi_auth_cipher_sgl(const struct
> >>> kasumi_test_data *tdata,
> >>>
> >>>  	/* Create KASUMI operation */
> >>>  	retval = create_wireless_algo_auth_cipher_operation(
> >>> -		tdata->digest.len,
> >>> +		tdata->digest.data, tdata->digest.len,
> >>>  		tdata->cipher_iv.data, tdata->cipher_iv.len,
> >>>  		NULL, 0,
> >>>  		(tdata->digest.offset_bytes == 0 ?
> >>> @@ -5175,7 +5194,7 @@ test_kasumi_auth_cipher_sgl(const struct
> >>> kasumi_test_data *tdata,
> >>>  		tdata->validCipherOffsetInBits.len,
> >>>  		tdata->validAuthLenInBits.len,
> >>>  		0,
> >>> -		op_mode, 1);
> >>> +		op_mode, 1, verify);
> >>>
> >>>  	if (retval < 0)
> >>>  		return retval;
> >>> @@ -5666,7 +5685,7 @@ test_zuc_auth_cipher(const struct
> >>> wireless_test_data *tdata,
> >>>
> >>>  	/* Create ZUC operation */
> >>>  	retval = create_wireless_algo_auth_cipher_operation(
> >>> -		tdata->digest.len,
> >>> +		tdata->digest.data, tdata->digest.len,
> >>>  		tdata->cipher_iv.data, tdata->cipher_iv.len,
> >>>  		tdata->auth_iv.data, tdata->auth_iv.len,
> >>>  		(tdata->digest.offset_bytes == 0 ?
> >>> @@ -5676,7 +5695,7 @@ test_zuc_auth_cipher(const struct
> >>> wireless_test_data *tdata,
> >>>  		tdata->validCipherOffsetInBits.len,
> >>>  		tdata->validAuthLenInBits.len,
> >>>  		0,
> >>> -		op_mode, 0);
> >>> +		op_mode, 0, verify);
> >>>
> >>>  	if (retval < 0)
> >>>  		return retval;
> >>> @@ -5852,7 +5871,7 @@ test_zuc_auth_cipher_sgl(const struct
> >>> wireless_test_data *tdata,
> >>>
> >>>  	/* Create ZUC operation */
> >>>  	retval = create_wireless_algo_auth_cipher_operation(
> >>> -		tdata->digest.len,
> >>> +		tdata->digest.data, tdata->digest.len,
> >>>  		tdata->cipher_iv.data, tdata->cipher_iv.len,
> >>>  		NULL, 0,
> >>>  		(tdata->digest.offset_bytes == 0 ?
> >>> @@ -5862,7 +5881,7 @@ test_zuc_auth_cipher_sgl(const struct
> >>> wireless_test_data *tdata,
> >>>  		tdata->validCipherOffsetInBits.len,
> >>>  		tdata->validAuthLenInBits.len,
> >>>  		0,
> >>> -		op_mode, 1);
> >>> +		op_mode, 1, verify);
> >>>
> >>>  	if (retval < 0)
> >>>  		return retval;
> >>> @@ -6643,7 +6662,7 @@ test_mixed_auth_cipher(const struct
> >>> mixed_cipher_auth_test_data *tdata,
> >>>
> >>>  	/* Create the operation */
> >>>  	retval = create_wireless_algo_auth_cipher_operation(
> >>> -			tdata->digest_enc.len,
> >>> +			tdata->digest_enc.data, tdata->digest_enc.len,
> >>>  			tdata->cipher_iv.data, tdata->cipher_iv.len,
> >>>  			tdata->auth_iv.data, tdata->auth_iv.len,
> >>>  			(tdata->digest_enc.offset == 0 ?
> >>> @@ -6653,7 +6672,7 @@ test_mixed_auth_cipher(const struct
> >>> mixed_cipher_auth_test_data *tdata,
> >>>  			tdata->cipher.offset_bits,
> >>>  			tdata->validAuthLen.len_bits,
> >>>  			tdata->auth.offset_bits,
> >>> -			op_mode, 0);
> >>> +			op_mode, 0, verify);
> >>>
> >>>  	if (retval < 0)
> >>>  		return retval;
> >>> @@ -6827,7 +6846,7 @@ test_mixed_auth_cipher_sgl(const struct
> >>> mixed_cipher_auth_test_data *tdata,
> >>>
> >>>  	/* Create the operation */
> >>>  	retval = create_wireless_algo_auth_cipher_operation(
> >>> -			tdata->digest_enc.len,
> >>> +			tdata->digest_enc.data, tdata->digest_enc.len,
> >>>  			tdata->cipher_iv.data, tdata->cipher_iv.len,
> >>>  			tdata->auth_iv.data, tdata->auth_iv.len,
> >>>  			(tdata->digest_enc.offset == 0 ?
> >>> @@ -6837,7 +6856,7 @@ test_mixed_auth_cipher_sgl(const struct
> >>> mixed_cipher_auth_test_data *tdata,
> >>>  			tdata->cipher.offset_bits,
> >>>  			tdata->validAuthLen.len_bits,
> >>>  			tdata->auth.offset_bits,
> >>> -			op_mode, 1);
> >>> +			op_mode, 1, verify);
> >>>
> >>>  	if (retval < 0)
> >>>  		return retval;
> >>> @@ -10818,13 +10837,8 @@
> >>> test_authentication_verify_fail_when_data_corruption(
> >>>
> >>>  	ut_params->op = process_crypto_request(ts_params-
> >>>> valid_devs[0],
> >>>  			ut_params->op);
> >>> -	TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ut_params->op, "failed crypto process");
> >>> -	TEST_ASSERT_NOT_EQUAL(ut_params->op->status,
> >>> -			RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_SUCCESS,
> >>> -			"authentication not failed");
> >>>
> >>> -	ut_params->obuf = ut_params->op->sym->m_src;
> >>> -	TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ut_params->obuf, "failed to retrieve
> >>> obuf");
> >>> +	TEST_ASSERT_NULL(ut_params->op, "authentication not failed");
> >>>
> >>>  	return 0;
> >>>  }
> >>> @@ -10879,13 +10893,8 @@
> >>> test_authentication_verify_GMAC_fail_when_corruption(
> >>>
> >>>  	ut_params->op = process_crypto_request(ts_params-
> >>>> valid_devs[0],
> >>>  			ut_params->op);
> >>> -	TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ut_params->op, "failed crypto process");
> >>> -	TEST_ASSERT_NOT_EQUAL(ut_params->op->status,
> >>> -			RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_SUCCESS,
> >>> -			"authentication not failed");
> >>>
> >>> -	ut_params->obuf = ut_params->op->sym->m_src;
> >>> -	TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ut_params->obuf, "failed to retrieve
> >>> obuf");
> >>> +	TEST_ASSERT_NULL(ut_params->op, "authentication not failed");
> >>>
> >>>  	return 0;
> >>>  }
> >>> @@ -10940,13 +10949,7 @@
> >>> test_authenticated_decryption_fail_when_corruption(
> >>>  	ut_params->op = process_crypto_request(ts_params-
> >>>> valid_devs[0],
> >>>  			ut_params->op);
> >>>
> >>> -	TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ut_params->op, "failed crypto process");
> >>> -	TEST_ASSERT_NOT_EQUAL(ut_params->op->status,
> >>> -			RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_SUCCESS,
> >>> -			"authentication not failed");
> >>> -
> >>> -	ut_params->obuf = ut_params->op->sym->m_src;
> >>> -	TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ut_params->obuf, "failed to retrieve
> >>> obuf");
> >>> +	TEST_ASSERT_NULL(ut_params->op, "authentication not failed");
> >>>
> >>>  	return 0;
> >>>  }
> >>> @@ -11149,6 +11152,7 @@ create_aead_operation_SGL(enum
> >>> rte_crypto_aead_operation op,
> >>>  	const unsigned int auth_tag_len = tdata->auth_tag.len;
> >>>  	const unsigned int iv_len = tdata->iv.len;
> >>>  	unsigned int aad_len = tdata->aad.len;
> >>> +	unsigned int aad_len_pad = 0;
> >>>
> >>>  	/* Generate Crypto op data structure */
> >>>  	ut_params->op = rte_crypto_op_alloc(ts_params->op_mpool,
> >>> @@ -11203,8 +11207,10 @@ create_aead_operation_SGL(enum
> >>> rte_crypto_aead_operation op,
> >>>
> >>>  		rte_memcpy(iv_ptr, tdata->iv.data, iv_len);
> >>>
> >>> +		aad_len_pad = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(aad_len, 16);
> >>> +
> >>>  		sym_op->aead.aad.data = (uint8_t *)rte_pktmbuf_prepend(
> >>> -				ut_params->ibuf, aad_len);
> >>> +				ut_params->ibuf, aad_len_pad);
> >>>  		TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(sym_op->aead.aad.data,
> >>>  				"no room to prepend aad");
> >>>  		sym_op->aead.aad.phys_addr = rte_pktmbuf_iova( @@ -
> >>> 11219,7 +11225,7 @@ create_aead_operation_SGL(enum
> >>> rte_crypto_aead_operation op,
> >>>  	}
> >>>
> >>>  	sym_op->aead.data.length = tdata->plaintext.len;
> >>> -	sym_op->aead.data.offset = aad_len;
> >>> +	sym_op->aead.data.offset = aad_len_pad;
> >>>
> >>>  	return 0;
> >>>  }
> >>> @@ -11252,7 +11258,7 @@ test_authenticated_encryption_SGL(const
> >>> struct
> >>> aead_test_data *tdata,
> >>>  	int ecx = 0;
> >>>  	void *digest_mem = NULL;
> >>>
> >>> -	uint32_t prepend_len = tdata->aad.len;
> >>> +	uint32_t prepend_len = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(tdata->aad.len, 16);
> >>>
> >>>  	if (tdata->plaintext.len % fragsz != 0) {
> >>>  		if (tdata->plaintext.len / fragsz + 1 > SGL_MAX_NO) @@
> >>> -
> >>> 11915,6 +11921,8 @@ static struct unit_test_suite
> >>> cryptodev_qat_testsuite  =
> >>> {
> >>>
> >>> 	test_AES_GCM_auth_encrypt_SGL_out_of_place_400B_400B),
> >>>  		TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup, ut_teardown,
> >>>
> >>> 	test_AES_GCM_auth_encrypt_SGL_out_of_place_1500B_2000B),
> >>> +		TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup, ut_teardown,
> >>> +
> >>> 	test_AES_GCM_auth_encrypt_SGL_out_of_place_400B_1seg),
> >>>  		TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup, ut_teardown,
> >>>
> >>> 	test_AES_GCM_authenticated_encryption_test_case_1),
> >>>  		TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup, ut_teardown,
> >>> --
> >>> 2.20.1
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>>   Diff of the applied patch vs upstream commit (please double-check
> >>> if non-
> >>> empty:
> >>> ---
> >>> --- -	2020-02-11 11:17:39.986002596 +0000
> >>> +++ 0023-test-crypto-fix-missing-operation-status-check.patch
> >>> 2020-02-11
> >>> 11:17:38.332000075 +0000
> >>> @@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
> >>> -From b26ef1a11f21ecde63582ed6db281c93ce9fbf23 Mon Sep 17
> 00:00:00
> >>> 2001
> >>> +From ce8302172f9f8e06833a49abf8b283a71b07dc3b Mon Sep 17
> 00:00:00
> >>> 2001
> >>>  From: Adam Dybkowski <
> >>> adamx.dybkowski at intel.com
> >>>>
> >>>  Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:58:52 +0100
> >>>  Subject: [PATCH] test/crypto: fix missing operation status check
> >>>
> >>> +[ upstream commit b26ef1a11f21ecde63582ed6db281c93ce9fbf23 ]
> >>> +
> >>>  This patch adds checking of the symmetric crypto operation
> >>> status  that was
> >>> silently skipped before. It fixes the wireless algorithms  session
> >>> creation
> >>> (SNOW3G, KASUMI, ZUC) and passing of the digest @@ -11,7 +13,6 @@
> >>>
> >>>  Fixes: c0f87eb5252b ("cryptodev: change burst API to be crypto op
> >>> oriented")
> >>>  Fixes: 77a217a19bb7 ("test/crypto: add AES-CCM tests")
> >>> -Cc:
> >>> stable at dpdk.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  Signed-off-by: Adam Dybkowski <
> >>> adamx.dybkowski at intel.com
> >>>>
> >>>  Acked-by: Fiona Trahe <
> >>> fiona.trahe at intel.com
> >>>>



More information about the stable mailing list