[dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw35929 [PATCH v1 4/6] net/mlx5: add Multi-Packet Rx support

checkpatch at dpdk.org checkpatch at dpdk.org
Sat Mar 10 02:27:15 CET 2018


Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/35929

_coding style issues_


WARNING:USE_NEGATIVE_ERRNO: return of an errno should typically be negative (ie: return -EBUSY)
#872: FILE: drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c:1428:
+				return EBUSY;

WARNING:FUNCTION_ARGUMENTS: function definition argument 'struct priv *' should also have an identifier name
#1094: FILE: drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.h:221:
+int priv_check_mprq_support(struct priv *);

WARNING:FUNCTION_ARGUMENTS: function definition argument 'struct priv *' should also have an identifier name
#1095: FILE: drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.h:222:
+int priv_mprq_enabled(struct priv *);

WARNING:FUNCTION_ARGUMENTS: function definition argument 'struct mlx5_rxq_ctrl *' should also have an identifier name
#1103: FILE: drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.h:245:
+int rxq_alloc_mprq_buf(struct mlx5_rxq_ctrl *);

WARNING:FUNCTION_ARGUMENTS: function definition argument 'void *' should also have an identifier name
#1111: FILE: drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.h:294:
+uint16_t mlx5_rx_burst_mprq(void *, struct rte_mbuf **, uint16_t);

WARNING:FUNCTION_ARGUMENTS: function definition argument 'struct rte_mbuf **' should also have an identifier name
#1111: FILE: drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.h:294:
+uint16_t mlx5_rx_burst_mprq(void *, struct rte_mbuf **, uint16_t);

WARNING:FUNCTION_ARGUMENTS: function definition argument 'uint16_t' should also have an identifier name
#1111: FILE: drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.h:294:
+uint16_t mlx5_rx_burst_mprq(void *, struct rte_mbuf **, uint16_t);

total: 0 errors, 7 warnings, 0 checks, 1013 lines checked


More information about the test-report mailing list