[dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw61490 [RFC v6 2/6] lib/ring: apis to support configurable element size

checkpatch at dpdk.org checkpatch at dpdk.org
Mon Oct 21 02:24:46 CEST 2019


Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/61490

_coding style issues_


WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#92: FILE: lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.c:50:
+rte_ring_get_memsize_elem(unsigned count, unsigned esize)

WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#92: FILE: lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.c:50:
+rte_ring_get_memsize_elem(unsigned count, unsigned esize)

WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#125: FILE: lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.c:80:
+rte_ring_get_memsize(unsigned count)

WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#142: FILE: lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.c:138:
+rte_ring_create_elem(const char *name, unsigned count, unsigned esize,

WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#142: FILE: lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.c:138:
+rte_ring_create_elem(const char *name, unsigned count, unsigned esize,

WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#143: FILE: lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.c:139:
+		int socket_id, unsigned flags)

WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#162: FILE: lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.c:206:
+rte_ring_create(const char *name, unsigned count, int socket_id,

WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#163: FILE: lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.c:207:
+		unsigned flags)

total: 0 errors, 8 warnings, 1073 lines checked


More information about the test-report mailing list